<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekend Replay on a Weekday: &#8220;Succes Verzekerd&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/weekend-replay-on-a-weekday-succes-verzekerd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/weekend-replay-on-a-weekday-succes-verzekerd/</link>
	<description>push play.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:02:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arc</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/weekend-replay-on-a-weekday-succes-verzekerd/comment-page-1/#comment-123596</link>
		<dc:creator>Arc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=5572#comment-123596</guid>
		<description>You could mix&amp;match some other game show ideas -- throw in a little Golden Balls maybe and have chips worth different amounts of money, but you can&#039;t see what exactly you&#039;re risking or what you&#039;ve won until the conclusion. 
 
At the ultimate stage you could throw in a little Deal making, and have the host offer to trade many chips of unknown value for a special high value chip. 
 
WE CAN TOTALLY AMERICANIZE THIS FORMAT. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could mix&amp;match some other game show ideas &#8212; throw in a little Golden Balls maybe and have chips worth different amounts of money, but you can&#39;t see what exactly you&#39;re risking or what you&#39;ve won until the conclusion. </p>
<p>At the ultimate stage you could throw in a little Deal making, and have the host offer to trade many chips of unknown value for a special high value chip. </p>
<p>WE CAN TOTALLY AMERICANIZE THIS FORMAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arc</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/weekend-replay-on-a-weekday-succes-verzekerd/comment-page-1/#comment-123597</link>
		<dc:creator>Arc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=5572#comment-123597</guid>
		<description>You could mix&amp;match some other game show ideas -- throw in a little Golden Balls maybe and have chips worth different amounts of money, but you can&#039;t see what exactly you&#039;re risking or what you&#039;ve won until the conclusion. 
 
At the ultimate stage you could throw in a little Deal making, and have the host offer to trade many chips of unknown value for a special high value chip. 
 
WE CAN TOTALLY AMERICANIZE THIS FORMAT. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could mix&amp;match some other game show ideas &#8212; throw in a little Golden Balls maybe and have chips worth different amounts of money, but you can&#39;t see what exactly you&#39;re risking or what you&#39;ve won until the conclusion. </p>
<p>At the ultimate stage you could throw in a little Deal making, and have the host offer to trade many chips of unknown value for a special high value chip. </p>
<p>WE CAN TOTALLY AMERICANIZE THIS FORMAT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/weekend-replay-on-a-weekday-succes-verzekerd/comment-page-1/#comment-123465</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=5572#comment-123465</guid>
		<description>An idea for a possible fix: Reload the contestant with money after a certain number of questions, somewhat like the Money Cards bonus game from Card Sharks.  Let the contestant play with 500,000 for the first three questions, then jack up the pressure for the last four by adding the other 500,000 into play.  Budget may become an issue (as payouts would be higher on average), but this would keep the money in play further into the game. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An idea for a possible fix: Reload the contestant with money after a certain number of questions, somewhat like the Money Cards bonus game from Card Sharks.  Let the contestant play with 500,000 for the first three questions, then jack up the pressure for the last four by adding the other 500,000 into play.  Budget may become an issue (as payouts would be higher on average), but this would keep the money in play further into the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Davis</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/weekend-replay-on-a-weekday-succes-verzekerd/comment-page-1/#comment-123462</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=5572#comment-123462</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a big issue, yeah.  I&#039;m actually fine if they can keep a lot of money in play for a while, but so often they just decimate the top prize by a staggering amount so early. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s a big issue, yeah.  I&#39;m actually fine if they can keep a lot of money in play for a while, but so often they just decimate the top prize by a staggering amount so early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Davis</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/weekend-replay-on-a-weekday-succes-verzekerd/comment-page-1/#comment-123464</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=5572#comment-123464</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a big issue, yeah.  I&#039;m actually fine if they can keep a lot of money in play for a while, but so often they just decimate the top prize by a staggering amount so early. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s a big issue, yeah.  I&#39;m actually fine if they can keep a lot of money in play for a while, but so often they just decimate the top prize by a staggering amount so early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/weekend-replay-on-a-weekday-succes-verzekerd/comment-page-1/#comment-123460</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=5572#comment-123460</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to think that what makes this uninteresting or unexciting is that from the first question, she&#039;s already not playing for the top prize. If you get some gutsy contestants that go all the way trying not to insure their answers, you could have some really exciting moments. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d like to think that what makes this uninteresting or unexciting is that from the first question, she&#39;s already not playing for the top prize. If you get some gutsy contestants that go all the way trying not to insure their answers, you could have some really exciting moments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/weekend-replay-on-a-weekday-succes-verzekerd/comment-page-1/#comment-123461</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=5572#comment-123461</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to think that what makes this uninteresting or unexciting is that from the first question, she&#039;s already not playing for the top prize. If you get some gutsy contestants that go all the way trying not to insure their answers, you could have some really exciting moments. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d like to think that what makes this uninteresting or unexciting is that from the first question, she&#39;s already not playing for the top prize. If you get some gutsy contestants that go all the way trying not to insure their answers, you could have some really exciting moments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
