<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tiny Rule Change for Next Season of &#8220;Lingo&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/tiny-rule-change-for-next-season-of-lingo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/tiny-rule-change-for-next-season-of-lingo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CarShark</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/tiny-rule-change-for-next-season-of-lingo/#comment-3876</link>
		<dc:creator>CarShark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=861#comment-3876</guid>
		<description>I agree. Any team with 5 or more usually wins. I didn't see anything wrong with the three stoppers before, and they still haven't added any bonus balls into the mix. Nothing too exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Any team with 5 or more usually wins. I didn&#8217;t see anything wrong with the three stoppers before, and they still haven&#8217;t added any bonus balls into the mix. Nothing too exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony DuMont</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/tiny-rule-change-for-next-season-of-lingo/#comment-3872</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony DuMont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=861#comment-3872</guid>
		<description>I don't think that this is a necessary rule change. After comparing the original Lingo to this version I'm thinking that the bonus round needs the biggest change, since once the first ball is drawn, as long as a team has enough they're sure to win, and we see a lot more wins than losses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that this is a necessary rule change. After comparing the original Lingo to this version I&#8217;m thinking that the bonus round needs the biggest change, since once the first ball is drawn, as long as a team has enough they&#8217;re sure to win, and we see a lot more wins than losses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
