<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The British are Better Than Us: &#8220;Countdown&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/</link>
	<description>push play.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:55:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Gandy</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-2/#comment-195191</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Gandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-195191</guid>
		<description>I just found out that there was an unsuccessful U.S. pilot in 1990. I&#039;m a huge fan of the show, but after looking at the pilot details, this is why the show didn&#039;t make it across the pond.

1. There were teams of two, not one-on-one as usual.
2. Cash prizes were involved. (Obviously.)
3. No numbers round and no conundrum. Yep, you read that right. The first round was a regular numbers round of nine letters. Another round was the same, but with eight letters and a &quot;wild.&quot; Any team that could make a nine-letter word here won a $25,000 bonus.
4. Bonus round was unscrambling words of increasing difficulty.

It&#039;s sad how they can&#039;t take a classic, bring it over here and leave it alone!

Source:
http://www.usgameshows.net/x.php?show=Countdown1990&amp;sort=0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found out that there was an unsuccessful U.S. pilot in 1990. I&#8217;m a huge fan of the show, but after looking at the pilot details, this is why the show didn&#8217;t make it across the pond.</p>
<p>1. There were teams of two, not one-on-one as usual.<br />
2. Cash prizes were involved. (Obviously.)<br />
3. No numbers round and no conundrum. Yep, you read that right. The first round was a regular numbers round of nine letters. Another round was the same, but with eight letters and a &#8220;wild.&#8221; Any team that could make a nine-letter word here won a $25,000 bonus.<br />
4. Bonus round was unscrambling words of increasing difficulty.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad how they can&#8217;t take a classic, bring it over here and leave it alone!</p>
<p>Source:<br />
<a href="http://www.usgameshows.net/x.php?show=Countdown1990&#038;sort=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.usgameshows.net/x.php?show=Countdown1990&#038;sort=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Spivack</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89498</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Spivack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89498</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your compliment. Maybe Danica could host herself. I was also thinking of Cris Franco (from Square One TV).

And if this show seems too much like a talk show, maybe I should point out that the classic panel game shows (WHAT&#039;S MY LINE?, TO TELL THE TRUTH, I&#039;VE GOT A SECRET) were like that, focusing on interesting guests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your compliment. Maybe Danica could host herself. I was also thinking of Cris Franco (from Square One TV).</p>
<p>And if this show seems too much like a talk show, maybe I should point out that the classic panel game shows (WHAT&#8217;S MY LINE?, TO TELL THE TRUTH, I&#8217;VE GOT A SECRET) were like that, focusing on interesting guests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeSant318</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89458</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeSant318</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89458</guid>
		<description>Anton, a master stroke - Danica McKellar was a math major in college, and would provide star power/curiosity factor...
Still undecided on a host...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anton, a master stroke &#8211; Danica McKellar was a math major in college, and would provide star power/curiosity factor&#8230;<br />
Still undecided on a host&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Spivack</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89398</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Spivack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 04:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89398</guid>
		<description>I would gladly watch a US version, and for me they don&#039;t need to play for cash. And they should use manual tiles instead of digital selection. TPiR uses trilons and eggcrate scoreboards and that works fine.

And I still believe each of the two rounds could have three letters rounds and one numbers round. For those who say the show is too talky, I must reply, weren&#039;t talk shows what usurped game shows in the 1990s? Of course there weren&#039;t that many great game shows created during that time (remember FAMILY SECRETS?). The casual atmosphere might work in its favor. And I&#039;m sure someone like Danica McKellar would be glad to do this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would gladly watch a US version, and for me they don&#8217;t need to play for cash. And they should use manual tiles instead of digital selection. TPiR uses trilons and eggcrate scoreboards and that works fine.</p>
<p>And I still believe each of the two rounds could have three letters rounds and one numbers round. For those who say the show is too talky, I must reply, weren&#8217;t talk shows what usurped game shows in the 1990s? Of course there weren&#8217;t that many great game shows created during that time (remember FAMILY SECRETS?). The casual atmosphere might work in its favor. And I&#8217;m sure someone like Danica McKellar would be glad to do this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Dreyer</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89393</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Dreyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89393</guid>
		<description>&quot;No one ever became poor under-estimating the intelligence of the American people.&quot;  I suppose the converse (contrapositive?  I&#039;m so far removed from my logic classes) replacing &quot;poor under-&quot; with &quot;rich over-&quot; might be true as well.

I would _LOVE_ an American game show renaissance where we start seeing more shows that celebrate intelligence, like University Challenge/College Bowl, Countdown, and heck, plenty of quiz game formats from the 70s and 80s.   But clearly, the powers that be are under the impression that folks wouldn&#039;t watch those shows.  WE would, obviously, but we&#039;re also folks who love game shows, so much so that we&#039;re even willing to spend time commenting on a board devoted to them.

It has been the case recently that prime time game shows = big money game shows.  A lot of formats fail when shoehorned into that.  So, we&#039;re left with the daytime option, but there you run into the choice of trying to displace some soap opera, Judge Pablum show, or Tyra-fraking-Banks.

The hope, as Alex did point out, is that there&#039;s enough other channels out there doing their own productions that more game shows may become feasible (I&#039;m surprised when I find people that would not otherwise watch other game shows that love Cash Cab).  Fingers crossed, of course, so we&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No one ever became poor under-estimating the intelligence of the American people.&#8221;  I suppose the converse (contrapositive?  I&#8217;m so far removed from my logic classes) replacing &#8220;poor under-&#8221; with &#8220;rich over-&#8221; might be true as well.</p>
<p>I would _LOVE_ an American game show renaissance where we start seeing more shows that celebrate intelligence, like University Challenge/College Bowl, Countdown, and heck, plenty of quiz game formats from the 70s and 80s.   But clearly, the powers that be are under the impression that folks wouldn&#8217;t watch those shows.  WE would, obviously, but we&#8217;re also folks who love game shows, so much so that we&#8217;re even willing to spend time commenting on a board devoted to them.</p>
<p>It has been the case recently that prime time game shows = big money game shows.  A lot of formats fail when shoehorned into that.  So, we&#8217;re left with the daytime option, but there you run into the choice of trying to displace some soap opera, Judge Pablum show, or Tyra-fraking-Banks.</p>
<p>The hope, as Alex did point out, is that there&#8217;s enough other channels out there doing their own productions that more game shows may become feasible (I&#8217;m surprised when I find people that would not otherwise watch other game shows that love Cash Cab).  Fingers crossed, of course, so we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89392</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89392</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting that clip.  I used to watch &quot;Countdown&quot; a lot when I lived in the UK, and it&#039;s always interesting to see when it changes.

&quot;Des Chiffres et Des Lettres&quot; - we get that in Canada, though I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s the original show or a Canadian version.  Very similar to &quot;Countdown&quot;, but I think they currently allow 45 seconds on the math rounds as opposed to the latter&#039;s usual 30 seconds.

Rachel Riley&#039;s first episode as hostess.  Long-running hostess Carol Vorderman, who was with the show since the beginning 26 years ago, was asked to take a pay cut this season by Channel Four Television, either 33% or 90%, based on what tabloid you believe, and decided to bow out instead.  The tabloids have been all over it since, especially after a former producer of the show or someone threw a glassful of wine at Channel Four&#039;s programming director at a resturaunt in protest.  Pesky global economy.

The bellhop from Barcelona still looks great after all those years.

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting that clip.  I used to watch &#8220;Countdown&#8221; a lot when I lived in the UK, and it&#8217;s always interesting to see when it changes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Des Chiffres et Des Lettres&#8221; &#8211; we get that in Canada, though I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s the original show or a Canadian version.  Very similar to &#8220;Countdown&#8221;, but I think they currently allow 45 seconds on the math rounds as opposed to the latter&#8217;s usual 30 seconds.</p>
<p>Rachel Riley&#8217;s first episode as hostess.  Long-running hostess Carol Vorderman, who was with the show since the beginning 26 years ago, was asked to take a pay cut this season by Channel Four Television, either 33% or 90%, based on what tabloid you believe, and decided to bow out instead.  The tabloids have been all over it since, especially after a former producer of the show or someone threw a glassful of wine at Channel Four&#8217;s programming director at a resturaunt in protest.  Pesky global economy.</p>
<p>The bellhop from Barcelona still looks great after all those years.</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89332</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 06:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89332</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, the format is fine for the game as is.  It has something that all shows need to have that play along factor. As for a host maybe Pat Kiernan(No Alex I&#039;m not sucking up.)? or some other Alex trebek type host out there. As for the set a modern look with flat screens and maybe a scrabble-like drop in box on the boards? if your gonna put in syndication or GSN I&#039;d leave the format as is for the season. If you are going to make it a primetime network thing a tournament or a money tree would work best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, the format is fine for the game as is.  It has something that all shows need to have that play along factor. As for a host maybe Pat Kiernan(No Alex I&#8217;m not sucking up.)? or some other Alex trebek type host out there. As for the set a modern look with flat screens and maybe a scrabble-like drop in box on the boards? if your gonna put in syndication or GSN I&#8217;d leave the format as is for the season. If you are going to make it a primetime network thing a tournament or a money tree would work best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Mark</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89227</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89227</guid>
		<description>I agree with Lex, everyone is too far away from each other on the set. Plus, I also agree that Chuck and Shandi would make a decent team. Chuck has plenty of word game experience, so I&#039;m sure he&#039;d do a respectable job. He has to recover from the disaster that was Freaking Million Dollar Cat Game Show somehow, right?

As far as the theme music goes, I find the current Countdown theme music and think music to be rather boring and flat. The current Countdown music is in dire need of a remix, IMO. I think a remixed version of the 1985 - 1995 Des Chiffres et Des Lettres theme music would work. I find it to be one of the best game show themes ever. 

For those of you who are interested in hearing what the &#039;85 - &#039;95 DCeDL theme music sounded like, here&#039;s a link for you: http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/Antenne%2B2%2B-%2BDes%2Bchiffres%2Bet%2Bdes%2Blettres/video/xnso7_generique-chiffres-et-des-lettres-a_ads</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Lex, everyone is too far away from each other on the set. Plus, I also agree that Chuck and Shandi would make a decent team. Chuck has plenty of word game experience, so I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;d do a respectable job. He has to recover from the disaster that was Freaking Million Dollar Cat Game Show somehow, right?</p>
<p>As far as the theme music goes, I find the current Countdown theme music and think music to be rather boring and flat. The current Countdown music is in dire need of a remix, IMO. I think a remixed version of the 1985 &#8211; 1995 Des Chiffres et Des Lettres theme music would work. I find it to be one of the best game show themes ever. </p>
<p>For those of you who are interested in hearing what the &#8217;85 &#8211; &#8217;95 DCeDL theme music sounded like, here&#8217;s a link for you: <a href="http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/Antenne%2B2%2B-%2BDes%2Bchiffres%2Bet%2Bdes%2Blettres/video/xnso7_generique-chiffres-et-des-lettres-a_ads" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/Antenne%2B2%2B-%2BDes%2Bchiffres%2Bet%2Bdes%2Blettres/video/xnso7_generique-chiffres-et-des-lettres-a_ads</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lex</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89209</link>
		<dc:creator>Lex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89209</guid>
		<description>First let me just say WHY IS EVERYONE ABOUT A MILE AWAY FROM EACH OTHER ON THE SET?

Moving on, I think this would work fine on cable, as said before. It could use some sort of in-between round, but if LINGO can get away with just one game, then Countdown could get away with only two. I wouldn&#039;t alter the main rounds at all, because that&#039;s the essence of the game. Computer update would work well, also like LINGO (hell, have Chuck and what&#039;s-her-face host :P). If a computer is used, the bonus/extra rounds could be similar to some flash games where you get a set of letters, and you create a word with some of them. Those used letters disappear while new ones fill in their blanks, and the old letters &quot;age&quot; in some way. Letting a letter stay on for too long invokes a penalty/foul. Could have the same thing with numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First let me just say WHY IS EVERYONE ABOUT A MILE AWAY FROM EACH OTHER ON THE SET?</p>
<p>Moving on, I think this would work fine on cable, as said before. It could use some sort of in-between round, but if LINGO can get away with just one game, then Countdown could get away with only two. I wouldn&#8217;t alter the main rounds at all, because that&#8217;s the essence of the game. Computer update would work well, also like LINGO (hell, have Chuck and what&#8217;s-her-face host :P). If a computer is used, the bonus/extra rounds could be similar to some flash games where you get a set of letters, and you create a word with some of them. Those used letters disappear while new ones fill in their blanks, and the old letters &#8220;age&#8221; in some way. Letting a letter stay on for too long invokes a penalty/foul. Could have the same thing with numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Power</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89205</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89205</guid>
		<description>I like that name Mike: MindGames, and I could see producers calling the letters round: something like scramble, the numbers game: number crunch and the conundrum: super scramble. 

my format would be for kids (I seriosuly think this could work on PBS)

the payoff for the winner is $250 + $25 per point in the difference of the scores (i.e. win 80-60 difference of 20, 20 * 25 + 250 = $750) consolation prize for the losing contestant of $1 per point plus the &quot;goody bag&quot;. octochamps (8-time champs) are retired and win a $2,000 bonus.

challenge of champions played for a grand prize like a trip or a computer and a $2,000 scholarship, a $1,000 scholarship for the runner-up.

I&#039;d use a scoring system similar to the french scoring system which is 1 pt. per letter in the longest word, 9 pts. and a $100 bonus for a 9-letter word. numbers is 9 pts. for hitting the target, 6 pts. for being the closest, the conundrum is worth 10 pts. 

lastly, as a host my first choice (I&#039;m ready to duck): Levar Burton, no hostess (the letters and numbers will be posted by computer).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that name Mike: MindGames, and I could see producers calling the letters round: something like scramble, the numbers game: number crunch and the conundrum: super scramble. </p>
<p>my format would be for kids (I seriosuly think this could work on PBS)</p>
<p>the payoff for the winner is $250 + $25 per point in the difference of the scores (i.e. win 80-60 difference of 20, 20 * 25 + 250 = $750) consolation prize for the losing contestant of $1 per point plus the &#8220;goody bag&#8221;. octochamps (8-time champs) are retired and win a $2,000 bonus.</p>
<p>challenge of champions played for a grand prize like a trip or a computer and a $2,000 scholarship, a $1,000 scholarship for the runner-up.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d use a scoring system similar to the french scoring system which is 1 pt. per letter in the longest word, 9 pts. and a $100 bonus for a 9-letter word. numbers is 9 pts. for hitting the target, 6 pts. for being the closest, the conundrum is worth 10 pts. </p>
<p>lastly, as a host my first choice (I&#8217;m ready to duck): Levar Burton, no hostess (the letters and numbers will be posted by computer).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89204</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89204</guid>
		<description>You can digitize the clock, but you can&#039;t replace the 30-second Countdown music - that is classic stuff and I can see that tune catching on quickly here in the US.  Dada-dada-da da da da boom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can digitize the clock, but you can&#8217;t replace the 30-second Countdown music &#8211; that is classic stuff and I can see that tune catching on quickly here in the US.  Dada-dada-da da da da boom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeSant318</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89197</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeSant318</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89197</guid>
		<description>Your Conundrum round is basically the &quot;Tournament&quot; bonus (2nd devised) of that old chestnut &quot;Caesar&#039;s Challenge&quot; (and what&#039;s Ahmad Rashad (Bobby Moore) doing now, anyway?), and only gave you 30 seconds to complete.  You had to be sharp to win that car.     

Thanks to Keith Olberman, &quot;Countdown (USA)&quot; would be retitled &quot;MindGames&quot;, with perhaps the Conundrum renamed the &quot;MindBender&quot; (?) - just a thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Conundrum round is basically the &#8220;Tournament&#8221; bonus (2nd devised) of that old chestnut &#8220;Caesar&#8217;s Challenge&#8221; (and what&#8217;s Ahmad Rashad (Bobby Moore) doing now, anyway?), and only gave you 30 seconds to complete.  You had to be sharp to win that car.     </p>
<p>Thanks to Keith Olberman, &#8220;Countdown (USA)&#8221; would be retitled &#8220;MindGames&#8221;, with perhaps the Conundrum renamed the &#8220;MindBender&#8221; (?) &#8211; just a thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mad Mark</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89195</link>
		<dc:creator>Mad Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89195</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always had an idea of how Countdown would be played if it were shown in the US. Here&#039;s what I came up with:

Game structure: 2 rounds, each consisting of 2 letters and 1 numbers game. At the end of the second letters game in each round, a &quot;Duel&quot; is played. In the Duel, the contestants must either find smaller words within a 9-letter selection accompanied by a clue, or do some kind of mental math. Money is awarded instead of points. They do this on DCeDL. 

Payout Structures

Letters Game: $50 for every letter in the word. 9-letter words are worth $900 (double score for getting a 9-letter word, just like the UK version).

Numbers Game: $500 for getting the target number right on the nose; $250 if you&#039;re off by 5, and $100 if you&#039;re off by 10. 

Duels: $500 if you buzz in with the correct answer.

These amounts double in the second round. 

Bonus Round: The Conundrum round from the UK version becomes the bonus game, albeit wiht a twist. Five conundrums of increasing must be solved within 45 (or 50) seconds. The first word has 5 letters, all the way up to the last one, which has 9. The letters in the words rescramble themselves every 2 seconds. Each correctly solved Conundrum is worth $5,000; getting them all pays $25,000. 

Other Stuff:

-The 8 players with the highest winnings return at the end of the season for a $250,000 tournament of champions.

-Dictionary Corner replaced by a hostess with a computer.

-Letter board is digitized via a large screen. Contestants still pick letters, but the hostess&#039; computer randomly selects them. Same applies to numbers game. Basically, with the computer, the hostess can serve all three secondary functions (DC, numbers / letters games) at once. 

-Set can stay as it is. The blue color with the letters and numbers background is awesome. 

-Clock becomes digitized as well, via the large screen used for gameplay. 

And that&#039;s about it. Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always had an idea of how Countdown would be played if it were shown in the US. Here&#8217;s what I came up with:</p>
<p>Game structure: 2 rounds, each consisting of 2 letters and 1 numbers game. At the end of the second letters game in each round, a &#8220;Duel&#8221; is played. In the Duel, the contestants must either find smaller words within a 9-letter selection accompanied by a clue, or do some kind of mental math. Money is awarded instead of points. They do this on DCeDL. </p>
<p>Payout Structures</p>
<p>Letters Game: $50 for every letter in the word. 9-letter words are worth $900 (double score for getting a 9-letter word, just like the UK version).</p>
<p>Numbers Game: $500 for getting the target number right on the nose; $250 if you&#8217;re off by 5, and $100 if you&#8217;re off by 10. </p>
<p>Duels: $500 if you buzz in with the correct answer.</p>
<p>These amounts double in the second round. </p>
<p>Bonus Round: The Conundrum round from the UK version becomes the bonus game, albeit wiht a twist. Five conundrums of increasing must be solved within 45 (or 50) seconds. The first word has 5 letters, all the way up to the last one, which has 9. The letters in the words rescramble themselves every 2 seconds. Each correctly solved Conundrum is worth $5,000; getting them all pays $25,000. </p>
<p>Other Stuff:</p>
<p>-The 8 players with the highest winnings return at the end of the season for a $250,000 tournament of champions.</p>
<p>-Dictionary Corner replaced by a hostess with a computer.</p>
<p>-Letter board is digitized via a large screen. Contestants still pick letters, but the hostess&#8217; computer randomly selects them. Same applies to numbers game. Basically, with the computer, the hostess can serve all three secondary functions (DC, numbers / letters games) at once. </p>
<p>-Set can stay as it is. The blue color with the letters and numbers background is awesome. </p>
<p>-Clock becomes digitized as well, via the large screen used for gameplay. </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s about it. Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STI</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89181</link>
		<dc:creator>STI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89181</guid>
		<description>As for &quot;Show Me the Money&quot;--was that a bad concept, bad execution, or both? I would tend more towards the latter than the former. Even &quot;Set for Life&quot; had a pretty good concept (the Guardian Angel), although that was even more abominable. [As an example of bad concept meeting bad execution, I submit &quot;The Chamber.&quot;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for &#8220;Show Me the Money&#8221;&#8211;was that a bad concept, bad execution, or both? I would tend more towards the latter than the former. Even &#8220;Set for Life&#8221; had a pretty good concept (the Guardian Angel), although that was even more abominable. [As an example of bad concept meeting bad execution, I submit "The Chamber."]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ucb2912</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/the-british-are-better-than-us-countdown/comment-page-1/#comment-89179</link>
		<dc:creator>ucb2912</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=3340#comment-89179</guid>
		<description>GSN apparently shot a pilot for a US version of Countdown a while back, but it never made it past the pilot stage. If anyone here is a member on Big Jon&#039;s PC Games forum, you&#039;ll know that I host a netgame version of Countdown, (with a few changes) and I don&#039;t have a problem finding contestants. I think Countdown could work in the US- Cut out the talking and some of the rounds, replace points with cash values, and maybe turn the Conundrum into a bonus round of some sort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GSN apparently shot a pilot for a US version of Countdown a while back, but it never made it past the pilot stage. If anyone here is a member on Big Jon&#8217;s PC Games forum, you&#8217;ll know that I host a netgame version of Countdown, (with a few changes) and I don&#8217;t have a problem finding contestants. I think Countdown could work in the US- Cut out the talking and some of the rounds, replace points with cash values, and maybe turn the Conundrum into a bonus round of some sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

