22 Sep
Posted by Alex Davis as GSN, Reader Input, Review, That's The Question
The new season of That’s The Question was going to be interesting to say the least. If you saw the first twenty episodes you may know there were a few, uh, issues. The set was odd, music and sound effects were god awful, the writing was poor, too many factual errors, the show felt like it was missing something, and the show was horribly cheap. I was a fan of season one, but there was some fear for season two. Nothing against GSN, but recently they haven’t exactly had the greatest track record for originals. A huge sigh of relief came when I found that they fixed 75% of the issues.
We already saw pictures of the set, and it is extremely nice; one of the best ones GSN has put together. It’s not a Millionaire clone like Chain Reaction and it doesn’t feel like the set is five feet wide like Camouflage. Luckily they fixed the spelling and factual errors. It’s also nice to see that the show has more than pop culture questions which has become a trend recently. Host Bob Goen (Who we will have an interview with next week, stay tuned) is as good as ever, which is very good. He’s honestly the channel’s best host currently. The music is a bit better this season if not a bit too upbeat to a level of almost the first two seasons of Lingo. The main reason I enjoy it is because it’s something we have very few of anymore: a fast paced buzzer quiz show with two people competing against each other.
Now for a few issues. I think I’ve said it about 50 times, but every time I still hope I can give some hint to a production company or to GSN: do we always need easy to win bonus rounds for $5,000? Can’t we have a tiny bit of originality? The Dutch version has interesting rules. When you win the bonus you have the option to gamble your money and come back next show or stop. If you come back and lose the game, you lose all your money. However, if you come back and win, you double your money and you can be on three shows max. What is it with GSN and refusing to do returning champs? They air episodes in order, so come on. The only other issue I have is that the game can be a bit repetitive after a bit. Some sort of change mid-show, like a bonus puzzle or something, would be nice.
Beyond that, it’s easily one of the best shows they’ve done in a while. It’s amazing that they’ve been on an amazing track record recently with shows like Grand Slam, Without Prejudice?, and That’s The Question. It blows Camouflage (Insider FYI: I wouldn’t count on it coming back, as least as of today) out of the water for sure. However, all I ever feel when I’m watching the show is that there is something missing. It’s mainly in the bonus area, but something is missing. Other than that, they improved the show from season one exponentially. Fantastic host, fantastic set, fun game, good contestants (at least for now); other than a few tiny issues which were mentioned above, the show is more enjoyable than most game shows that have come out anywhere recently, and that includes both syndication offerings.
4 Responses
N
1September 22nd, 2007 at 11:03 pm
My husband and I were both contestants on the show (our episodes haven’t aired yet). We had a blast and Bob is quite nice. It would be nice for them to have returning champs. I’m hoping they’ll do a Championship tournament with all the winners, similar to what they did with Pyramid. (I was a contestant on that show, too, which was also a blast.)
Great site, by the way. :)
John
2September 23rd, 2007 at 12:55 am
I didn’t mind the sound effects. I’m not a fan of the female voice-over from the first season, but thank goodness that was cut off the second season.
Mike B.
3September 23rd, 2007 at 2:17 pm
Aside from a more interesting and challenging bonus round, I think the thing that’s missing from the show is energy. Obviously the best thing to do would be to get a real audience, but if that’s too much to ask for, just crank up the canned applause a little. ‘Temptation’ and ‘Crosswords’ don’t have real audiences either, but they don’t seem as overtly quiet as this show.
That said, I agree wholeheartedly with this review. Now that they’ve fixed the problems evident in season 1, we have a challenging and engaging show with a solid (albeit derivative) format, strong writing, a slick set and a great host. I concur that it’s better overall than the two syndie offerings (though ‘Crosswords’ could be great if they can fix the scoring system) and much better than ‘Camouflage’.
SuperMatch2007
4September 23rd, 2007 at 8:08 pm
in my opinion, the second season is worse. The music sounds like a ten-second loop of a Ciara song. There are more pop culture questions and he content fits the population who watch The Simpsons. The font is horrible! I hope these errors can be considered.
OFF-TOPIC: I hate Harper Collins! We don’t a need a bloasted countdown, for crying out loud!
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a Reply
GSN Schedules
11/17 to 11/2311/24 to 11/30
12/1 to 12/7
12/8 to 12/14
12/15 to 12/21
MiniBuzz
Buzz In
Biggest Buzz
Categories
Pages
Archives