Review: ABC’s “101 Ways to Leave a Game Show” is Good Brainless Summer Fun
Next Tuesday is the debut of ABC’s new summer game show 101 Ways to Leave a Game Show. The British version aired last year on BBC to little fanfare. Practically nothing of the BBC version survives here, and for the most part that’s a very, very good thing. For the past few years ABC has been pairing shows with their hit stunt show Wipeout trying to find a good companion. I think they’ve got as good a candidate as any here. ABC’s version makes the British version look like Candyland. It’s by far the most extreme game show on television.
101 Ways to Leave a Game Show pits eight people against each other in a quiz show to win the weekly $50,000 top prize. The eight are split into two groups of four that compete individually. To start the host, Jeff Sutphen, asks a numerical question. Each player writes his or her answer down on a pad. The people closest get to answer the actual trivia question first. Jeff then asks the round’s question with as many choices as there are players. Each player, in order of how they did in the numbers round, gives an answer. The last player is stuck with whatever is left. All but one answer is right. All you need to do is not be wrong. If you are, you’re physically ejected from the game.
When two are left from each group, everyone joins together and climbs to the top of The Tower for the finale. The Tower is a ten story structure decked out in lighting and features four diving boards suspended water. A numerical trivia question is asked again, and the people closest go first. Jeff asks another question with four choices. The order of answering depends on how close you got on the last one. This time there are three wrong and one right. If you answer wrong the diving board you are standing on drops and you free fall into the water ten stories below. If you get the right answer you win $50,000.
Let’s be honest: no one will be watching this for intense trivia battles. You’re watching to see people get tossed, thrown, and battered for cash. It’s the same people watch Wipeout. A major complaint of the British version was that all exits really degenerated to dropping people into water. While that’s funny for a bit it gets old very quickly. The ABC version is miles more inventive and, frankly, terrifying than that. The very first exit anyone will see is a contestant being flown away, standing up, on the wings of a bi-plane. Other exits in the first episode include the reverse bungee and dropping backwards off a moving truck. The finale, though, shocked me. It’s really a ten story free fall into water. There’s a support cable and safety obviously, but there’s no giant bungee apparatus like the British version that slows your fall significantly. If you are wrong, you’re going straight down. It’s extreme, terrifying, and incredibly fun to watch. However, the finale on top of the Tower is apparently the same each week so we’ll see if it stays enjoyable week after week.
The terrifying new challenges have created a new tone for the show. The British version was a bit more goofy and comical. The ABC version takes a more Fear Factor-like approach. It’s also a very different tone from sister show Wipeout. There’s no fake studio. Contestants don’t stand behind a podium. No traditional game show trappings. It’s all done on location and shot on a large scale. It’s not the quickest show on earth. We only get five questions/exits a game. However, there’s no long countdowns or anything like that. Any extra time is spent getting to know contestants, and showing off the exits. Speaking of Jeff, he does great. He’s the host of Nick’s BrainSurge which I’ve not seen so I went in blind. He does a great job.
The only issue I can find that could hinder the show, structure wise, is that it takes a while to get to the first exit, which, again, is the focal point of the show. It takes some time to cut to the chase. Wipeout cuts to bashing people over the face with foam platforms quickly. This show takes about six or seven minutes to get there. I really don’t know what could have been done but hopefully that audience will carry over to see this. The success of the show is just going to depend if the same crowd that likes Wipeout will carry over here and enjoy the physicality of this. I did. We’ll see if anyone else does.
101 Ways to Leave a Game Show is turn-your-brain-off television at its core. I went in there expecting what I got and left satisfied. It’s got a little trivia to keep those fans engaged but it’s got some very creative and jaw-droppings exits to make the Wipeout fans come over. If you come here often then you’ve probably seen the British version. If you were turned off by that I encourage you to check out the ABC version. It’s a big improvement and a good action summer game show.








After The Voice is done airing I will be watching this, hopefully it gets put up on hulu because it looks like its going to be very entertaining to watch
ARE YOU NUTS!?
10 questions in 1 hour – that’s one every six minutes. Sorry guys, can’t get behind this. Give me Who’s Still Standing any day. I’d much rather watch the drops more often and have more gameplay.
Why on Earth did they change the game so much? I think the saying “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” applies here. The original game meant that they stretched around 17 questions into an hour, and consider WWTBAM can get many, many more in 25 minutes, they should have been able to get the original game in with plenty of padding.
With all due respect to you….NUTS!
The show was too slow for American Audiences. That’s why they made some changes. Also, remember, your version aired on the Beebs, where they don’t have to worry about commercials.
But in America, we do have commercials. That means that getting through the same number of questions in 15 minutes less time, as massive speed increase. ABC could speed up the show drastically just by having to fit it in the available time.
Millionaire is currently averaging 13 questions per show, with the clock they averaged about 15 questions per show and pre-clock they averaged 17 questions per show.
When Regis did Millionaire they had about 17 questions per show plus 3 fastest finger questions, so that is far from many, many more.
This is more along the lines of 5th Grader, Downfall and Money Drop in question content. At least this throws in the stunts instead of BS buildup for nothing; unless of course they do a bunch of BS buildup for nothing like the British version.
I guess for us trivia fans, it can’t be as bad as Deal or No Deal which only ever had one question repeated over and over…
Really? I can’t believe that they get through so few questions… I’m guess I’m just used to far slower primetime quiz shows. After MDMD, everything seems plenty fast to me.
“101″ is meant to be a stunt show with trivia, not a trivia show with stunts. Just enjoy it for it’s entertainment value. Watch J! for intelligence.
MountainHawk, what’s the point of a stunt show if the only people ‘completing’ them are the people who are out of the game. It’d be great to see someone on top of a biplane… if they’re doing that for the money or something. This is just silly.
Hopefully, it’ll at least last long enough for us to see all 101 exits.
101 Ways to Leave a Game Show seems to give me a vision of Downfall and Crash Course mixed together. At least in Downfall you could win $1,000,000. But in 101 Ways to Leave a Game Show, it’s only $50,000. A bit of a price differential if you ask me, but in this downward spiral of an economy, people will take what they can get I suppose…
No one has ever come close to winning the $1,000,000 on Downfall.
On 101, there WILL be a $50,000 every episode.
Do the math.
Going off topic a bit, as I’m surprised Paul Alter’s death hasn’t been mentioned here, He died within the last week at age 89. Of course, he’s best known for directing Goodson-Todman shows for 45 years, starting with Cullen’s TPiR and the original TTTT, and continuing through Dawson Feud, Tattletales, and Barker TPIR, from which he got forced into an early retirement in late 2000 by Pearson/Fremantle.
See, I’m confused. Alex says it’s more Fear Factor, yet the “Sneak Peek” is a quicker version of the British show. I hope the actual show is more of the latter.
Although the BBC made an even bigger hash of this than they have of Wipeout, even with the bigger stunts it’s still a show which probably sounded better at the pitch than it’ll ever end up on screen, so I’d be amazed if it lasted the summer.
AS A WIPEOUT AND AMERICA’S GOT TALENT VIEWER, I WOULD LIKE TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO WARN AMERICA THAT “101 WAYS TO LEAVE A GAME SHOW” IS NOT ONLY INEFFECTIVE, IT’S ALSO DOWNRIGHT DANGEROUS.
IF “101 WAYS TO LEAVE A GAME SHOW” ISN’T CANCELLED IMMEDIATELY,
SOMEBODY’S LOVED ONES…MAYBE YOURS… WILL BE KILLED.
I COMPLETELY agree. It’s not funny to see people or if they’re stunt doubles, to face their death. It’s not funny at all, it’s just innapproppiatte and dangerous, we don’t need more game shows, Minute to Win It, Wipeout, The Price is Right is enough! And I especially hate how the host acts like it’s so hilarious to dump someone into shark-infested waters! Like what the heck!? How’d you like to be in that postion jerk? I hope it gets no views and is cancelled for good.
The only problem with the show is the fake actors that are pretending to be normal contestants. Every contestant reminds me of the joe schmo show. Watch them carefully and yoyll see what i mean
I watched this tonight for the first time….with my 12 year old daughter. Sorry, but animal cruelty isn’t something we can get behind. Absolutely disgusted.
i think that 101 ways to leave a game show would be great if it weren’t so dangerous. i just watched an episode where they dropped a man attached to a chain into bloody water that was shark filled and left him there….hello can u say death trap? this is not something that should be aired as a family tv show to watch bc its not suitable for children of any age and its wrong to show the world what fun u can have trying to kill people..