<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RECAP: Deal or No Deal 10/13/06</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/recap-deal-or-no-deal-101306/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/recap-deal-or-no-deal-101306/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: KP</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/recap-deal-or-no-deal-101306/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>KP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=488#comment-268</guid>
		<description>Pedantry - PJ's was a Technical PLAYER Win, as she won more than half the peak offer of 551k - in other words, she won more than the Banker saved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pedantry - PJ&#8217;s was a Technical PLAYER Win, as she won more than half the peak offer of 551k - in other words, she won more than the Banker saved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
