07 Aug
Posted by Alex Davis as CBS, Power of 10, Reader Input, Review
I finished watching CBS’s Power of 10 on TiVo, and here is my initial reaction: “Wow, this is really good.” I know I’ve ragged on Michael Davies a lot recently because of what I still think is the worst revival I’ve ever seen, Chain Reaction (which I partially place on GSN’s restrictions as well, mind you). I think Mr. Davies has completely redeemed himself with both Grand Slam and this. We’ve gone over the rules extensively for the past few months, but you can read them by clicking this.
Simply put, shows like Power of 10, with 1 VS 100 thrown into this as well, continue to give me faith in our little genre while shows like Set For Life damage me on the inside. Let’s start with the positives. As with everything on TV currently, very nice set and music package. It keeps it modern while making it look different than what’s on currently. The contestants are likable. Drew Carey is very nice as host. He had a few issues, but big deal; this is episode one. Episode two tapes tomorrow so he can figure out how he comes off on TV. The gameplay is almost so unbelievably simple that it’s engaging, which makes it interesting. While I love 1 VS 100, it is a bit complicated. Power of 10 keeps it very simple while making it incredibly nerve-wracking, dramatic, and fun. Mr. Davies has a knack for doing that (See Millionaire, Who Wants to be a). The prize money keeps it fun too. I’m never one of the people that’s begging for assloads of money to be poured out, but I’m sick of every show on earth offering a million. Something unique will make it stand out, and this did it here.
Now for the negatives, which aren’t many. I know it’s just a product of Deal or No Deal, but I’m sick of the relationship seat having a part in the game. This is one thing I like about 1 VS 100; it’s just the player and the player alone. Do we really need a family member to help out? It’s very obvious that it’s to stretch time out, but I think something else can be done. One thing that may hurt this show is a lack of energetic, talkative contestants. If I have to sit through an hour of someone twisting a knob without giving off any emotion or essence of personality, I’ll go insane. I’m sorry, but I’m a person of current society. I need drama and intensity. For now it’s doing that. My only other problem is the money. Is this show going to make it too easy to win a million? For now, I think not. But to be honest, even if I had a slight guess, I’d take that 10% range I have and risk $90,000 for $900,000 more. One of the huge problems I had with the rules originally was that it was extremely simplistic. This is a strength for now, but I’m nervous if this will be a strength for a long period of time for the non-game show fans.
Please don’t let these comments distract you from the fact that the game is terrific. Every show has negatives, and I think this easily has the least amount of initial negatives out of any show I’ve reviewed. I place it right around 1 VS 100’s level. I’m sorry to reference the show so much this review, but I just see them as being similar. A good quiz show is very hard to come by, and this show is just what I wanted. We’ve been on a huge role with shows recently. I hope we can keep this up. Power of 10 is smart, dramatic, well-hosted, intense, energetic, and so much more. It’s everything I want in a game show and more. Simply put, Power of 10 is the power of CBS. What are your thoughts?
61 Responses
The Great Butler
1August 7th, 2007 at 9:22 pm
I enjoyed it greatly. Drew was a little shaky at first but he settled in nicely, and seeing the kid win a cool million was nice.
Tyrone Allen
2August 7th, 2007 at 9:24 pm
There’s not much game involved, yet it’s quite intriguing. Drew did make quite a few jokes, but since they only helped to build rapport between the players, it wasn’t a problem. Now I *know* he’ll do at least “good” on TPiR.
I’m happy. I’m watching next week.
Brandon
3August 7th, 2007 at 9:29 pm
Michael Davies has a knack for making something engaging when there’s not too much game. Honestly, Millionaire is about as basic as it gets, yet it’s a fun show.
I liked what I saw tonight. Drew seemed to stumble a bit, but he still did really well. It provided a lot of input from co-workers in terms of opinions, so that earns extra points in my book.
Alex Davis
4August 7th, 2007 at 9:32 pm
I saw it on TiVo, and I have to say I am incredibly impressed. The show moved along how I wanted it to go, the players were engaging, the production was impressive, and Drew Carey was as good as he is in everything. I can’t wait to see next week’s episode.
Justin
5August 7th, 2007 at 9:42 pm
The next episode of Power of 10 airs on Wednesday. And I did like it!
Luke
6August 7th, 2007 at 9:42 pm
It was pretty much awesomeness. I do agree that Drew stumbled, but its his first time hosting it. I thought he was really funny so that totally makes up for it.
Its actually on again tomorrow at 8PM EST.
dropzone5
7August 7th, 2007 at 9:53 pm
I only caught the last 10 minutes or so of it, but I like what I see. And someone won a million on the first show? What a way to start a series!
I liked what I saw, though. Definitely watching again tomorrow.
MrTVAMFM
8August 7th, 2007 at 10:05 pm
Wow. Holy cow. Yay, Drew. Yay, Michael Davies. Yay, CBS. I didn’t even mind those Seacrest-Saget-Howie cliffhangers before the commercial. That only happened once, I think, maybe twice.
In the words of Kurt Vonnegut and Ambrosia, nice, nice, very nice.
Narro
9August 7th, 2007 at 11:01 pm
I just sat there watching saying, “There’s nothing I would change here. Wow.” The qualifying round is just as intense as the main game, the questions are provocative and entertaining, and I personally love seeing the line graph of audience responses. Plus, Drew’s little aside about not rehearsing the ten million dollar endgame made me smile inside. Overall, an excellent show.
Intelligentfan777
10August 7th, 2007 at 11:02 pm
Awesome Show. It’s great to finally see someone win a Million in this recent crop of Prime-Time Games, hope we see more!
Also, CBS can finally join all the other major networks in proudly claiming that at least one person won $1,000,000 or more on one of their Prime-Time game shows. The reality shows we know about, but an actual in-studio game show contestant winning a million had eluded them….until now. They came very close in the past with one woman winning $500,000 on Winning Lines. Oh, and lest you forget the poor girl who came within a millimeter of winning the million on the Big Wheel during that particular TPIR MDS in 2003.
David (AKA John Goodman)
11August 7th, 2007 at 11:27 pm
My tape crapped out after about 10 minutes. What I saw I really liked, though. Drew had me cracking up.
Lee
12August 8th, 2007 at 12:13 am
To me, the mark of a successful game show is if it has you yelling at the screen. When
Jamie was trying to decide whether to go for the 10 million, and I saw how that answer was to be decided, I actually found myself saying to the tv, “WALK AWAY!!!”
And Drew proved that he actually can do a legit game show. This program’s is a keeper!!!
Kevin
13August 8th, 2007 at 12:23 am
Hmmm I do like the show a lot, but my only gripe about it is I wish it would move just a wee bit faster. One contestant in 50 minutes? Come on!
eric
14August 8th, 2007 at 12:29 am
It was clear to me from the start that CBS wasn’t just copying NBCs Formula (Funny/Well known non game show personality+1/2 way decent format=great show. Which By my count only has an 80% success rate anyway) when they decided on Drew Carey. Its a great show that everyone can play along with however it is also somewhat intelligent. Although I do belive they should increase the range for the $10,000,000 question or do something similar to Card Sharks when they had the sliding board for the car lets say exactly right $10,000,000 1% away $5,000,000 2% $2.500,000 3% a push 4% or more as a loss or something like that. After watching Drew interact with the contestants I think TPIR will be just fine.
Kevin
15August 8th, 2007 at 12:32 am
Re: eric
Isn’t the range the same as for the $1,000,000,000 question?? Still a 1 in 10 (er, 11) shot?? I know what you mean though.
But really, anyone who goes for the 10 mil is out of their mind (unless they’re already financially secure I guess).
Narro
16August 8th, 2007 at 12:42 am
I guess the best part of this show–and the part I just realized right now–is that this show is extremely brainy without having an extremely brainy aura. You can just watch, or you can analyze the question and think about the answer, or you can think about how the question itself is worded and how that might have had an impact on the results of the question. You cover all three types of viewers effortlessly. Bravo.
steve
17August 8th, 2007 at 12:51 am
just watched the tape… (sorry, i’m not a tivo-er yet.) all of a sudden, my faith in the big-money game show has been restored. the entire show was pleasing to me, audibly, visually, and overall gameplay. the music, although always present (except during contestant getting-to-know-you interviews), but it was never overbearing. for lack of a better word, it “clicked.” the set was also impressive… somehow, i think the inwardly-rounded diamond will be the new shape of game shows for a while (i’m pretty sure the floor is the same shape in DFtL), but the screens in the background and… was that a balcony on both sides, or just an interesting set of frame lights? either way, that set just looked plain sweet. awkward tangent along those lines, for some reason, i really liked the way the one screen in the background would display the contestant’s face with the dollar amount next to it… for some reason, i liked that look. i don’t think i’ve ever seen that done before. very unique.
the gameplay was also very solid. i did see a bit of a mildly redundant pattern though:
1. drew reads the question. (i liked the mild “preamble” that most of the questions had. like, that little factoid that set up the question at hand. for example, the fact about umpteen million hispanics in america, leading to the question about spanish in schools.)
2. drew tells contestant to not lock in answer, but just take a guess. contestant does so. audience begins yelling higher/lower in here.
3. audience poll revealed. (very nice, by the way… when that popped up on the first question, my jaw honestly dropped.)
4. drew turns to the family member for their opinion. more audience yelling.
5. contestant makes final decision on answer, locks in. oscillating computer of death reveals answer. we cheer.
here’s the kicker though… despite the pattern that i thought was so incredibly obvious, the game still seemed fresh the entire way through. i think that having a host that knows how to banter, and having contestants and family members that know how to banter back really helps the overall entertainment value of the show.
a couple of downsides… drew really did seem a bit chatty. i know, it’s his first show, but he seemed to do way more talking than the contestant after a question was read. the contestant should really speak what they have on their mind about what might influence a statistic more than drew should. my other minor downside was that quite frankly, the questions did seem a bit easy. i was able to guess within about 5% of the questions on the show except for one or two. (given, on most of the questions, you could quickly narrow the playing field down from 100% to about 50%. example: why would over 50% of americans feel kids must learn spanish in school?) do i think i could do better on the show for real? heck no, i’d soil myself in a minute. i’m an armchair contestant. and there’s especially no way on earth i’m taking the gamble on the $10 million question.
which leads to the final bit of my rant, the $10mil question. i made a prediction when the last Po10 update appeared on here that very few people, if any at all, would actually make the $900k risk to play the final guessing game. since we’ve already let the spoiler cat out of the bag, i can say that tonight might have served as proof of that. i still highly doubt that many people will risk so much money on a 1-in-10 chance (correction: 1-in-11!), even with such a high jackpot payout, and a large guaranteed safety net of $100k. is this a bad thing? well, not necessarily. the risk is high enough that it might be another show or four before we see someone go for the bigg’n, but yet it’s still probable enough that someone just might strike it lucky and win. if every contestant went for the $10mil and won, the show probably wouldn’t be as exciting anymore. if every contestant dared and lost, the show itself would almost seem like a lost cause. i think that maybe this 1-in-11 hurdle might actually be the right height for someone to jump over. not too simple, but not too daunting.
that all having been said, i was quite pleased with what i saw. i’m looking forward to the next show!
steve
18August 8th, 2007 at 12:57 am
afterthought… this is a very strange parallel, but way back when on “play the percentages,” wasn’t the jackpot on that show reserved for exactly nailing the percentage on a question (or at least, for one of the show’s many rulesets)?
Derrick
19August 8th, 2007 at 1:00 am
I thought the premiere of “The Power of 10″ was wonderful. In fact, it was the best game show premiere I have ever seen. I love the set, the graphics, and the host.
I believe this show will be on for a very long time.
Intelligentfan777
20August 8th, 2007 at 1:12 am
Yeah, that “Exploding” win graphic for the $1,000,000 was super neat! I can only imagine what it might look like if someone wins the $10,000,000!
Brandon
21August 8th, 2007 at 1:27 am
Steve, you’re right…I think the jackpot started at around $25,000 and increased $1,000 a day until a team made an exact guess.
And this was in 1980 dollars.
David (AKA John Goodman)
22August 8th, 2007 at 1:45 am
I just went on TV.com and discovered something pathetic. “Set for Life” actually has a higher rating than “Power of 10.” The user’s votes average 6.5/10 for “Set for Life” and 4.0/10 for “Power of 10″ (with 33 “abysmal” votes).
Dontryl Alexander
23August 8th, 2007 at 1:54 am
It was exciting to see a $1,000,000 win on the first show, can’t wait for tomorrow’s show. Anybody tape the first show, YouTube it, please.
Jackson
24August 8th, 2007 at 2:52 am
On TV.com a lot of the complaints were misspelled and completely asinine. One person complained that it preempted House which is on a different channel. Another said National Bingo Night was more interesting. Looks like we are dealing with the same type of people that feel ‘Grand Slam’ is too difficult and boring to enjoy.
C’mon people, are we as a society so dumb that we have to enjoy game shows based solely on luck. Sure there is some guessing in this one (almost pricing game-esque) but you cannot compare this to Set for Life or some other guessing game.
Jerry D
25August 8th, 2007 at 3:59 am
I have to agree with you on this one, Alex. This is probably the best game show to debut since 1 vs. 100. My only real concern is that there will be too many million dollar winners. And it’s nice to see a show with a main game nowadays. :-P
Overall, I’d give it an easy B+ which could be an A- or more later.
Tom Jetland
26August 8th, 2007 at 10:34 am
I guess I’m gonna have to be the voice of dissent.
They did a lot of things right– likeable contestants, nice set, and charismatic host (this gives me a lot of hope for TPiR).
But the show is so damn boring. Think about it. After the initial elimination round, he answered four questions. In 35 minutes. Four questions in 35 minutes. Yes, they’re interesting questions. But no trivia or poll question in the world is so interesting that it merits being dragged out for ten televised minutes. And I used to think that WWTBAM was slow-paced.
lobster
27August 8th, 2007 at 10:39 am
The little bubble slider graphics and how it responded to the contestants’ “knob”s were awesome.
Megan Miguez is the casting director, and although it appears I’ve likely blacklisted myself from being on any ER-produced show (I tried to convince her my team of game show nerds would kick ass at CR by pointing out that these model-quality pretty people they keep having on the show are horrible at the game (which they really really are!) — and from our correspondence I get the impression she isn’t too receptive to my playful persistence :D ) — I contend that the teenager that won the $1mil was a good pick for this show.. He seemed genuinely grateful and deserving.. Although his dad reminded me of Richard Gere.
As for the $10mil, I cannot imagine ANYONE who would risk $1 million on a 1:11 shot on a total GUESS, even when the fallback is $100,000.. unless, as many people pointed out, the contestant is already loaded to begin with — but what fun is that? :p
THE GAME GUY
28August 8th, 2007 at 11:47 am
Cut this show to an half hour & this show will really fly. A good show but pasing is to slow.
myke25
29August 8th, 2007 at 12:07 pm
I really loved this show. The elimination round was very exciting. The Power of 10 end game has a lot of built-in tension. Drew was a little too chatty at first, but thoroughly entertaining. He was as excited as anyone that the kid won the $1 Mil. I think he did a pretty good job and will only get better.
The ONLY thing I think should be tweaked a bit is the audience survey. Granted it was just the first night, but the audience response seemed to match the national survey pretty closely. If a player justs goes by the audience poll, they’ll have a pretty good chance of winning at least the $1 Mil. If that trend continues, they may want to consider relegating the use of the audience poll to “lifeline” status, allowing a player to see the polling results before they lock in their answer only ONCE. Then the poll could be used to build tension after the lock-in, much like “5th Grader” uses the class’s answers to make the player second guess themselves.
But that’s pretty minor. This show rocks! And we’ll all sleep better knowing that TPIR is in good hands.
Mark
30August 8th, 2007 at 12:09 pm
You know what I liked best about the show? The fact that we were actually watching the first episode! We weren’t watching some episode that was hand-picked by producers to be a good show debut. For me, this killed Identity and 5th Grader. The shows were edited so we essentially knew what would happen. Of course, eagle eyed people will notice a bump-in promo for the show’s closing revealed who would win the head-to-head that evening and who will win it for the next game. PLEASE, CBS, DON’T BE LIKE EVERY OTHER GAME SHOW and show revealing promos of the show in the future. Not only does this spoil the episode that’s advertised, but it then we know when there’s not a big promo that nothing exciting will happen. At this point, that’s the only thing I care about in a game show.
l.e.
31August 8th, 2007 at 12:21 pm
I’m glad they weren’t using old Atari paddles for the knobs. Think how jumpy the pointers would be :P
Anyway, I find it funny that no one has one $1,000,000 on DoND or 1 vs. 100, and on CBS’s first prime-time game show in quite a while, someone gets it on the first episode.
Jay
32August 8th, 2007 at 1:51 pm
Jackson, Re the “House MD” thing…that person may have been Canadian. Global airs Po10 up here and it might have bumped the House rerun. (Global also airs House)
Canadian networks (CTV & Global) cherry-pick the US shows they want to air.
Jackson
33August 8th, 2007 at 3:23 pm
Thanks for the clarification. It makes more sense then. Still think this show is pretty good.
Adam
34August 8th, 2007 at 4:20 pm
Power of 10 is a excellent show. The format is very engaging and entertaining. Drew Carey is a excellent host. He was very happy for the contestants not to mention when Jamie won the Million Dollars. He has execellent interaction with the contestants and doesn’t make the show all about him. I have no doubt in my mind that Drew will do great on TPIR. All in all the Power of 10 has the power to be on the air for a long time to come. and the ratings showed that. I believe in the Power of 10!
lobster
35August 8th, 2007 at 4:27 pm
l.e., that’s because Po10 is structured to where a $1m win is relatively easy.. I bet there’ll be plenty of $1m winners over the course of the first run..
Also I forgot to mention — the whole audience going “whoooaaaaa” bit during the revealing of the actual percentage is a -little- cheesy, as I can envision some flamboyant warm up guy instructing everyone to pretend they’re all on a rollercoaster or something :D ..
Brandon
36August 8th, 2007 at 4:35 pm
I do agree that the “whooooaaaa” was cheesy, but for some reason it works…kinda like on The Price is Right, when the audience groans as Hans gets closer to falling off the Cliffhangers mountain.
lobster
37August 8th, 2007 at 4:51 pm
ya but I imagine THOSE groans come from the heart :D
Hey, by the way, does anyone want to make wagers on if Drew will make any subtle Po10 references when they bring out the Range Game on TPiR or not? :D
LObs
Drew
38August 8th, 2007 at 7:26 pm
I also dig this new show. Drew Carey is surprisingly warm and humorous with the contestants. I like the very cool set and music. I also handled gameplay very well. But, does every show, excluding 1Vs.100, need a family corner? I thought contestants should be in the driver’s seat only. And does every show need drawn out reveals and commercials at critical points in the game? UGH. Overall, finally a show I can sit through, which is 10,000,000 more than I can say with DoND.
David (AKA John Goodman)
39August 8th, 2007 at 9:23 pm
Whoops! Sorry about that. I wasn’t aware that I wasn’t supposed to post that YouTube link. Anyway, back on topic.
I finally saw a full episode. Sweet Jesus, what an awesome show! It has a great play-along factor, which is a huge plus for me. Drew Carey can be funny without overshadowing the contestants. The $10,000,000 is winnable. My only gripe is that it is a bit drawn-out, but hey, it isn’t near as bad as “Identity.” I really hope this show lasts because this and “1 vs. 100″ are the only current prime-time games I like.
Ohio Wx Guy
40August 8th, 2007 at 9:45 pm
CBS has nailed it! As long as CBS does not “Millionaire” it, The Power Of 10 is the next huge hit in Game Shows… After this run is over, bring it back for sweeps and CBS is lookin’ good!
I know someone at CBS is reading this… This is the best game show I have seen in many, many, MANY years!
Scott Meckley
41August 8th, 2007 at 10:56 pm
I missed it tues night but finally watch it tonight and i highly enjoyed this I would say for me this is my third favorite game show behind DOND and 1 vs 100. Drew did a great job of hosting this and i find it very interesting to try and guess what americans think. I know it’s early to even suggest this but I hope this show does so well that it comes out to play on DVD, PC, PS2, Wii, PS3, plug in play. I think this show has some potential and to me it beats the daylights out of National Bingo Night I mean come on on national bingo night (red or black odd or even) I like that this game makes you think and i don’t really call it a trivia game but more of a survey game like Family Feud. I would like to see this game be added on joytube. I hope this game last a while and i think it deserves to be on instead of either Kid Nation or Survivor if not at least bring this back in midseason. I think winning 10 million will be very challenging. I also like that two people go against each other in order for the chance to play for 10 million dollars. I think that this will be a hit and I think this show should keep CBS as number one.
mrbrown
42August 9th, 2007 at 12:35 am
Drew’s performance on Power of 10 has definitely made me think that he’ll be a great host for The Price is Right. Additionally, Power of 10 is an excellent show - I really enjoyed it and think CBS has a hit on their hands.
I’m just waiting for Carey to accidentally slip up and say something like, “Get closest to the actual percentage without going over… oops, wrong show.”
Alex
43August 9th, 2007 at 3:42 am
I think the second show pretty clearly shows that not everybody will win a million… most questions I did well on but I missed by a mile on a few! And the studio audience graph is proven to be no guarantee. I don’t have much issue with the pacing; maybe it could be a LITTLE faster, but they don’t go too far milking stuff for drama. Drew is very personable and his current approach should make an excellent fit for TPIR, but I think he needs to calm down a bit with the contestants for this show… that time where he said he was “praying” for a contestant’s success was a bit much. Also, I still think the $10,000,000 question could use a major overhaul, BUT I’ll still be watching this very good show whenever I can catch it :) Oh, and a note to CBS… please no more than an hour a week with maybe an occasional second hour!
steve
44August 9th, 2007 at 2:02 pm
just saw the second episode… it’s good seeing that there were no changes from the first episode from the second, at least as far as i could tell. one thing that was constant… sadly… it seems like in both of these episodes, the commercial time does seem abnormally long… did it seem like there were a lot of commercials, or have i just not watched primetime network television in a long time? luckily though, since both of the episodes i’ve seen were on tape, i fast forwarded through said commercials… could that be why i feel the pacing was alright, while others think it was too slow?
on a completely unrelated note, two points to the kid for using the phrase “bimodal distribution.”
Brandon
45August 9th, 2007 at 2:18 pm
Steve, count on an hour-long show taking 16-20 minutes of commercials. And 16 is a VERY generous estimate…more like 18-20. I think “The Price is Right” takes even more commercial time. I guess those Rascal scooters and “dia-beet-us” commercials pay the bills. ;-)
Intelligentfan777
46August 9th, 2007 at 2:49 pm
To follow up on steve’s point at the end, it proves that they are casting honest non-overthetop relatively smart people to play. Which is the norm for a Michael Davies produced game show. And I think it’s a good thing that last night’s show proved that the big money is not that easy to win, at all! I think most of us were fooled a bit by that “hot dog eating contest/presidential debate” question.
Anyway, a well done show all around. I am so glad that Davies is steering the genre to where it needs to be with his brand of game shows. The genre as a whole still looks smart and promising overall, and that’s good. Endomol could really do itself and the genre as a whole a real service buy researching how he makes these shows, and taking more after him. Granted DoND and 1 vs. 100 are great, but those are the only real “hits” they’ve had.
Oh, and has anyone played the online P^10 game yet?
Scott MN
47August 9th, 2007 at 3:01 pm
Alex:
Dead on with this one. Here’s my critique:
Host–Drew does a good job of engaging the contestants, mixing the right amount of humor with tension. If he’s like this on TRIP, it’ll be in good hands.
Format–Pace was a little slow the first night, but picked up last night. One thing I would disagree with is that it’s going to be easy to get to $1,000,000. There were a couple times last night I thought everyone was using the right logic only top be bitten by the answer. That’s what happens when you are basing the game on a random survey. But, part of the intreague for me is not only the game, but the answers sure say alot about what we think.
My only suggestion is that maybe they consider going to a format like GREED on the elimination game, where the loser “goes back into the pool.”
All in all, CBS should keep it around.
Scott
48August 9th, 2007 at 4:36 pm
Awesome game, both episodes. Came into the first episode just in time to see Jamie win the million. Drew’s reax was priceless and genuine. “He won a million bucks ! Our first show, our first contestant, and he won a million bucks!” Drew gives the contestant a spontaneous hug. He will be great for TPIR. And he looks better in a suit than I ever thought possible.
DDELE7
49August 9th, 2007 at 4:56 pm
So here are all the game shows on the networks that i can see in this fall season
The Power of 10-CBS
Deal or No Deal-NBC
1 vs. 100-NBC
Are You Smarter than a 5th Grader-FOX
Dont forget the lyrics-FOX
and i doubt it that ABC’s Set for life will last long, but ABC would probably renew it midseason just to to keep things interesting.
The Power of 10 is a wonderful show. Drew Carey will be fine doing TPIR. But i hope he can manage commuting cross country between Television City in Hollywood and The Kaufman Astoria Studios (where Power is taped) in NYC.
Its nice to finally see someone win the million on a game show. I doubt that someone will win the mill on DOND or 1 vs. 100 anytime soon.
This will be the firing pin for CBS to produce more shows or even revive some classics for big money nightime. I know that they’ll probably do more Million dollar TPIR shows, since i hear the set this season can be packed away for road shows. Who knows of the endless possibilities.
Congrats to The Power of 10. Lets see how long it takes for them to give away the $10 mill, the first show in Television that would do so.
————–
Do you guys think that this means the other shows out ther will have to up the cash prizes ?
myke25
50August 9th, 2007 at 6:01 pm
I’d like to see what Michael Davies would do with a Pyramid revival. Sony co-produces The Power of 10 and owns Pyramid.
————-
DDELE- Deal Or No Deal has gone as high as $6 Mil in the past…I can see them doing 10 during premiere week.
lobster
51August 10th, 2007 at 2:07 am
(brandon: I always thought it was creepy how Wilford Brimley would stare at me through the screen and guilt me into ordering Liberty medical supplies — and I don’t even HAVE dia-beetus! (check your blood sugar — and CHECK IT OFTEN!) )
lobster
52August 10th, 2007 at 2:14 am
Anyway, if I may rant once more about my gameshow industry nemesis ;) the lovely Miss Megan Miguez, contestant coordinator for Po10. So the kid on tonight’s show admits that he sent in a TAPE of himself singing ICE ICE BABY, and THAT was enough to get to Megger’s heart, however when *I* concocted a fantastic and stirring depiction of how my pals and I were true Chain Reaction nerds who were likely the only applicants that KNEW of the original show ( I even superimposed our freakin’ heads on an old Cullen screen shot! :D — http://host.mogal.org/chainreaction.jpg ) Meggs — who was part of the contestant pickin’ for CR — was unfazed, opting for the model-licious pretty people who barely got through two words in the bonus round! :p Ah, game show nerds just don’t always get our due.. ;) Makes ya wonder..!
LObz
SeanB
53August 10th, 2007 at 11:21 am
That picture is probably the reason you did NOT get picked for the show…
Mike
54August 10th, 2007 at 12:48 pm
Gotta agree with Sean. If nothing else, the pic shows the contestant coordinator you’re a geek with too much time on your hands.
lobster
55August 10th, 2007 at 2:01 pm
haha .. it’s all true, Mike — but when is that ever a bad thing when it comes to game show hardcoreness? Tell me 90% of the people that talk about game shows online aren’t geeks w/ too much time on their hands :D .. but hey, there’s no shame: Similar tactics have gotten me on two other GSN game shows in the past, why not this one :p .. By the way, speaking of time on your hands, last time I was in NYC I stopped by ER to deliver some of those kickass gourmet cupcakes as a peace offering, but alas, little did I realize at the time that a video of a Vanilla Ice impersonation was more their speed .. :D
Of course, Sean, I realize the pic is ridiculous, which was the point :D .. but wouldn’t you think that dorks who are familiar with the game itself would be better contestants than dumb scenester-looking frat boys who pay $200 for their hair to be styled? If you’ve ever watched the new incarnation of Chain Reaction, do you not agree that the game play is just horrible on just about every episode due to the contestants’ lack of strategy? That’s what you get when you solicit for applicants off of Craigslist and handing out fliers on Manhattan street corners :D .. Let me just say this — at the CR auditions waiting in line, I met many people who not only have never heard of the game, but didn’t even know what GSN was .. it’s a shame that people who are GOOD at the game are weeded out in favor of dumb people with expensive fashion sense and lots of hair gel ;]
(And by the way, WOF is the absolute worst violator and subscriber of this phenomenon)
So, you tell me: Which is the lesser of two evils in contestant coordinating: Would you rather have pretty people that can’t play at all, or slightly game-show-nerdy (but still TV-presentable) dudes that know the game well?
what a fun topic :p
maybe Meggers herself can chime in and tell us what she looks for :D
LObs
Ben Williams
56August 10th, 2007 at 2:51 pm
There’s an exception to every rule…Ive seen some of these “pretty people” that played the game very well.
Intelligentfan777
57August 10th, 2007 at 6:01 pm
lobster, there’s a huge flaw in your theory. Just because a person looks “pretty,” that doesn’t mean that they can’t play a game. IMO that has been the most ridiculous misconception I have heard. You forget to mention that throughout history, game show contestants have been considered “pretty”, “handsome,” “sparkling”, or what have you. Richard Dawson himself has been quoted as saying such, but the main thing is that for the most part, they are bright for that particular game, and do play the game well. That is no different today, for the most part. Also, on WOF, the contestants who audition, no matter what they look like, are tested extensively on puzzle-solving, and all around knowledge of the game. That has never changed. If you mistakenly call a letter on the board, or incorrectly solve a puzzle, that’s on them. BUT…it does not necessarily mean they can’t make up for it latter and still win the game by playing smart. You seem to be saying that every contestant has to be a game show geek to play well?! THAT’S….FRIGGIN’…….LUDICRIOUS! And it’s ignoring history, and reality.
So in conclusion, from an actual scientific and sociological stand point, you’re theory could not be more incorrect.
lobster
58August 11th, 2007 at 4:02 pm
SCIENTIFIC?! loololoolololololol you’re crazy.
I do appreciate the attempt to explain it to me, but you obviously haven’t watched too many game shows “throughout history”, as I can find you 10,000 clips of hideous looking people that have been on game shows — are you kiddin’? They have not always been model-quality people like they’re trying to cast for now. There IS a HUGE difference between the way the cast for shows NOW and THEN.
If you really believe someone can get on WOF “No matter what they look like” as long as they are great at puzzle-solving, you really do have no idea what you are talking about :p.. I will tell you, I have auditioned for WOF *9* times in the past 10 years, and I am now very familiar with what they are looking for, and it is NOT puzzle-solving prowess believe it or not. It is all a huge cattle-call now and they weed out people by the thousands with literally a six-second display of your ability to call out letters. The written test means absolutely nothing. Have you even watched the show in the last couple of years? Very rarely do you see a *good* game strategist on the show. (And don’t give me that “hey, there’s lights and cameras all around, they’re all just — nervous!) :p .. WOF doesn’t necessarily cast for super-pretty-people like CR does, but they go down a level and cast for EXTREMELY excitable (but stil more-than-marginally pretty) people.
Again, I do appreciate your take, but if you want to really experience what I’m talking about, audition for a show or two and then tell me your thoughts ;) I’ve gone to 24 of them.
tootles =]
lobs
Mike
59August 11th, 2007 at 4:13 pm
Well said, Lobs. Very well said.
JohnnyO
60August 12th, 2007 at 1:10 pm
People do goofy stuff all the time to get noticed beyond the regular
fray of contestants, so although Lobs’ tactics may be seen as over-the-top this
really is nothing new, and personally I find that Chain Reaction pic to be very clever and hilarious. If I were coordinating contestants for Chain Reaction and saw that I would instantly take notice, as in “Wow, this guy knows the history of this show!”. I’m pretty certain no one else who has appeared on the GSN version even knows who Bill Cullen was let alone seen the original.
Intelligentfan77’s professing himself as an expert on sociological and scientific theories of game show contestant-picking almost made me spit my drink at my screen. Lobster is correct: It is a known fact that Wheel of Fortune (as of late) unfortunately exclusively looks for a certain style of energetic excitedness regardless of the player’s ability to play the game well. The “written tests” exist to create the impression that your puzzle-solving calculates into their decision, but as is standard with many shows, they are not graded and are practically used for the coordinators to write notes on as they go down the line and judge you on how you call out maybe a letter or two. That is the only interaction you get with the coordinators, and all the while they are judging your appearance and demeanor. (Jeopardy and Millionaire at least grade their tests -first- and weed out the people who can’t play the game, and -then- they interview the good players)
Anonymous
61August 14th, 2007 at 4:02 pm
This game is Card Sharks without the cards. Boring, boring, boring.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a Reply
GSN Schedules
11/17 to 11/2311/24 to 11/30
12/1 to 12/7
12/8 to 12/14
12/15 to 12/21
MiniBuzz
Buzz In
Biggest Buzz
Categories
Pages
Archives