Probably the event of many of our summers, GSN’s Grand Slam, has sadly come to a close. A champion has been crowned and his name is Ken Jennings. It was a very close game except for the third round, though. If you didn’t see the first round you need to look for it anywhere you can. I think I nearly vomited by the end I was so excited. A 0:00:14 second win was unreal. All of Embassy Row, the contestants, and GSN should be commended for this show. We haven’t seen a show this fast and smart in ages. It was a welcome change from shows like Set For Life.
I’m going to start with the few negatives I had so we can get it out of the way. First, I did not agree with the way players were seeded. I thought some sort of short minute quiz, off camera, would have been better. Second was the addition of the pop culture round for the championship game. I’m not calling foul and shenanigans because I wanted Ogi to win, but if you’re going to have a round in there, have it from the start. My final gripe was with Amy Kelly. If she reads this I am deeply sorry, but she had absolutely no place in this tournament. It’s obvious they wanted a GSN contestant for a cheap plug, but this bombed for them. She did not play that well on her game of Lingo and ended up getting lucky and getting a ball worth a lot of money. Is that worthy of a place in this tournament? There are two people I had in mind who would have been a lot better, two of which are easy to get a hold of. The first is Robert McKee of Lingo and Friend or Foe?. The man flew through ten Bonus Lingo words on his own and also won the incredibly tough online tournament game. He should have been an easy choice, and he’s easy t get a hold of. I know Embassy Row has his information somewhere. Second is Maria Lay, a $100,000 winner from Russian Roulette. I don’t know where you’d get a hold of her, though. Winning that show is tough in the first place, and answering all ten questions in roughly 51 seconds isn’t easy either. She apparently has the brain and speed.
However, enough gripes, because there weren’t that many. I think everyone deserves so much praise for this entire production. I’m relatively new to the entire game show world. I only started getting into them with Russian Roulette and Who Wants to be a Millionaire? so truthfully I did not know many of these people. However, they really got me interested and pulling for many of them. Phyllis Harris was my main example for that. It’s also amazing how this show has started a little community in many places. For one, we’ve had many many many contestants from Grand Slam communicate with many of our commenters, and I am thankful more than you can imagine. I still plan on making several Grand Slam posts, touching base with contestants as time goes on. There’s no reason to let this buzz die. In keeping the community together, Ed Toutant and runner-up Ogi Ogas have set up a website for fans at the Grand Slam Arena. There, on the site, are various stats, videos, pictures, and a message board to talk to fans of the show and contestants. Please be sure to keep checking it, as updates will be made as soon as available.
I think the main reason this show was so enjoyable was how fast, smart, and exciting it was. I was on the edge of my seat throughout many of those matches. I’m not that excited when I watch people randomly pick briefcases or boxes on Deal or No Deal. The play-along factor was amazing. There were several shout-at-the-television moments, moments of happiness, sorrow, and more. Plus the math round was a nice touch. We don’t usually see math oriented shows in America so that round was rather exciting I thought. I also just felt for the losing and winnings contestants the entire time. I felt sad when some of my favorites lost. I was cheering when my picks won. Again, I don’t get that from shiny light and big dollar total shows.
Though he was rough at first, Dennis Miller just got better and better. He ended up being great by the end. If he can stay in the non-horribly obscure area, he’s great. Amanda was also fantastic. And we all know Pat Kiernan was great as the Questioner. Next season, though, can we just call him Pat Kiernan? “The Questioner” got a bit goofy.
Now comes the big question: What are the chances this will be brought back? With so many new shows coming, I can’t see why not. I already touched upon two people who I felt would be great for the show. We’re bound to have at least one contestant from each Crosswords and Temptation that can make it. We have at least two contestants from 1 VS 100 who deserve a shot. Not to mention new champions coming from Jeopardy?, Family Feud, Duel, and many more. My main suggestion to GSN and Michael Davies is to hold either an online or regional qualifier to allow some civilians into the tournament. I think it would be quite interesting to see how a regular person who won a qualifying game would do against someone like Ken Jennings. This show was just all around entertaining. Yeah, there were a few issues (mainly with the Switches), but that hardly equaled a quarter of how fun, entertaining, and exciting the show was. I hope to see a 2008 Grand Slam tournament, and I’d love to hear your thoughts on the completed tournament.
5 Responses
Quwen Qyiz
1September 10th, 2007 at 10:06 pm
I was hoping that Ogi Ogas won too. But gosh, you sound like a boy with a new toy. xD
I think it turned out well too.
Intelligentfan777
2September 11th, 2007 at 12:11 am
I second all that Alex! Like I’ve said before, this, along with World Series Of Pop Culture, Crosswords, etc. could start a NEW trend in game shows that could really be a huge boon for the genre! The tournament-style game show’s time may have come. Also, the fact that ABC is finally delving back into Quiz Shows that actually require skill and intelligence to win (Duel), is perhaps, another good sign.
I mean, think about it, ABC taped Set For Life over a year ago, and it was set to air that year. But then, they actually screened the shows themselves and probably felt the same way we did! “My God, this is bad! Why in the world did we pick this up?!” So, of course they delayed airing the episodes for nearly a year, because they knew even the most casual fan was going to look at it and want to stick their head in the oven afterward. But, they had blow it off somewhere, so….anyway, let’s hope ABC gets their heads on straight again in terms of game shows this season.
Oh, and I seriously doubt we’ll see any Temptation champs (if you can really call them that). I mean, after seeing the first episode, that show may not live long enough to see any compete on a future Grand Slam tournaments. In addition, I doubt GSN and the powers-that-be would even look toward that show unless they were desperate. GSN is heading back in the right direction from what I can see. Now surly they could fix Chain Reaction, couldn’t they?
pubgal
3September 11th, 2007 at 12:41 pm
Dear Alex,
So glad that you enjoyed GRAND SLAM. I really enjoyed your review of the finale and will pass along your suggestions to the programmers. As soon as I hear anything about a possible season 2, I will let you know. I promise. Thanks for watching and for your support. Anxious to hear what you think of That’s The Question which premieres tonight with that new fabulous set.
Talk to later.
lobster
4September 11th, 2007 at 3:07 pm
:D .. I’m humbled indeed.. and I would be honored to rip up the bracket representing the habitual GSN’ers..
I cannot imagine GS not being brought back.. it is the first game show I’ve ever seen discussed on Buzzerblog where EVERYONE that commented on it appeared to love it.. Although there were critiques, not one person said they completely disliked it. The bracket format is brilliant, allowing viewers to start to recognize the people they liked and root for. Even on here, you could see the stark contrast between site visitors and who they were rooting for, sparking debates about contestant intelligence based on the shows they were on, predictions, etc. Not to mention half the GS contestant field hanging out in here chiming in with their thoughts… as a fan of a show, that seriously was very cool.
When else, really, in television history were so many people who are involved on a nationally televised show so accessible to talk to and share viewer input with?
I’m sure if they brought it back and maybe tweaked the time slot a little bit they could hype the hell out of the show and really get some viewers hooked.
cheers
LObs
Intelligentfan777
5September 11th, 2007 at 4:12 pm
Everything he said and more.
I mean, how often do you get a chance to talk to these people. It’s something we need more of in game shows.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a Reply
MiniBuzz
Buzz In
Biggest Buzz
Categories
Pages
Archives