31Dec2010
Exciting Moment on Last Night’s “1 VS 100″ Thumbnail

Exciting Moment on Last Night’s “1 VS 100″

Like we said before, starting this Monday, the entire week of January 3rd will double the top prize of GSN’s quiz show 1 VS 100 to $100,000.  However, we’re still getting some pretty intense moments from the current $50,000 prize.  Last night showcased one of those moments.  The contestant, Gregg Whitney, made it to the 9th question of the game with $5,000.  He decided to risk his money, with both Helps remaining, to to try knock out the remaining 23 members of the Mob.  What followed is something that’s never happened before in the American version before.

I still think the bounty system from the first season (money per mob member knocked out) works best, but the lower stakes is making the money ladder pay scale feel better at least.

Author
Alex Davis

About the Author

has written 2959 articles on BuzzerBlog.

Alex Davis is an award winning writer and producer based out of Pittsburgh, PA, who works out of New York, Los Angeles, and London. Alex is the head writer and editor for BuzzerBlog and is the president and head of development of 5Hole Productions, specializing in unscripted formats for television and internet play.

Visit this author's website   ·   View more posts by

Share This.
  • Subscribe to our feed
  • Share this post on Delicious
  • StumbleUpon this post
  • Share this post on Digg
  • Tweet about this post
  • Share this post on Mixx
  • Share this post on Technorati
  • Share this post on Facebook
  • Share this post on NewsVine
  • Share this post on Reddit
  • Share this post on Google
  • Share this post on LinkedIn

Discussion

13 responses to "Exciting Moment on Last Night’s “1 VS 100″"

  • KevinM says:

    Never before happened before!

  • BillCullen1 says:

    Wow! I thought for a few secs maybe the one Mob member who didn’t say Pri-i won. An exciting but anti-climatic moment.

    • Shannon Kahn says:

      And a host who was on the ball and paying attention (i.e. not Carrie Ann Inaba) would have picked up on that and played it up.

      • Chris says:

        To be honest, I doubt Bob Saget would have handled it any better.

        • Jordan says:

          Yes agreed lol, it probably wouldn’t have crossed either of their minds. But it was definitely an exciting and shocking moment, as Carrie Ann put it. I had a bad feeling when 22 of the mob members picked Prii, I thought it was a little strange pertaining to the difficulty of the question. The selections should have been more evenly distributed.

  • Woodie B. says:

    Come to think of it, ‘Trust the Mob’ would have been useless as well, since he would have been locked in with ‘A’. When Jason Luna won the million with the ‘A’ (Christmas) answer, he left the ‘Trust the Mob’ help on the table. Had he used it, the same outcome would have resulted–everyone wins nothing.

  • Dean Lewis says:

    Can’t really call it an “exciting moment” when the show is boring and dull.

  • Darren says:

    Er,…

    How exactly do you take the plural of a verb? You can have a plural *form* of a verb, but then you’d need to know what tense and what person. (In English, the form of a verb used with “we”, “you” as in y’all and “they” are the same, but that’s true for almost no other language on the planet.)

    In short, this question looks like something someone who thinks they know Latin pulled out of his backside. Are the people who write Million Dollar Money Drop involved with this show, by any chance?

    • Scott says:

      Incidentally, yes. Both 1 VS 100 and Million Dollar Money Drop were created by Endemol.

      This moment was funny, but I still think Bob Saget is a better host than Carrie Ann. He knows how to inject humor into the show, while Carrie Ann is just…there…if you know what I mean…

  • Poochy.EXE says:

    I could’ve sworn I saw a YouTube clip of this exact same outcome on the British version a couple years ago, but I can’t find it.

  • Bobby says:

    This is where the rule actually makes the original catch phrase of the show (“Either you will win or they will win”) wrong since nobody wins. This is where a rule change does make sense similar to a spelling bee. In a spelling bee, if a round ends with everyone being buzzed out, that round is null and void, with the round repeated. In this case, both surviving Mob players and the One would have their round nullified and be asked a replacement question. In this case, the One cannot stop but must answer the replacement question. That might be a rule change that could easily be administered.

    A veteran quiz host of Chuck Woolery’s calibre, however, would have treated it differently.

  • jkbrtchr says:

    The plural of prius is prii though, I think it was a scam by the show so noone got any money, priora wasn’t the correct answer. That was a total cheat

  • [...] to be a good one for game show fans, starting Monday with GSN’s “1 vs. 100.” As previously tipped by BuzzerBlog, the show is doubling its top prize this week from $50,000 to $100,000. GSN’s latest teaser [...]

Leave a Comment