Archive for the 'Review' Category

27
Mar

REVIEW: Ludia’s “The Price is Right”

Do you remember when we talked about a “Price” PC game in development? Well, after a long wait, it has been released to the public.

I must say, it’s pretty good. Graphics are good-looking,

There’s only a couple of minor issues. First, the prizes are video clips from actual aired shows, so there’s a very small chance that somebody playing may have that episode on tape, and can then guess the ARP exactly. Second, it would be nice to have keyboard support for typing in bids. Clicking on “hidden arrows” up and down gets the job done, but it’s not the way the average user would expect to enter numbers on a PC game.

The complete list of pricing games:

  • 3 Strikes
  • Bonkers
  • Check-Out
  • Cliffhangers
  • Flip Flop
  • Freeze Frame
  • Hole in One (or Two)
  • It’s in the Bag
  • Master Key
  • Money Game
  • Plinko
  • Punch-A-Bunch
  • Push Over
  • Race Game
  • Range Game
  • Shell Game

Overall, I give the game 4/5. Try it out first, then buy it if you like it. I certainly did. :-DLudia’s “The Price is Right” software is available as a 30-minute free trial or as a $19.99 purchase (plus applicable sales tax). Download it here.

As a tip: You can skip through Rich’s explanation of Contestant’s Row, the pricing games, etc., by clicking anywhere in the main portion of the screen. However, you cannot skip through prize descriptions (unless you bid on the first showcase, which will then produce a “Skip” button to click on during the second).

18
Mar

Preview of “Bingo America”

As I recently said, I really mis-reviewed How Much is Enough? and I do apologize and hope you’ll still believe me for some of my reviews. Because of that last horrible judgement on my part, I was a tiny bit afraid of Bingo America. It had three check marks which made me afraid. One, again, my wrong opinion of How Much is Enough?. Two, it’s well documented that I truly think National Bingo Night is the worst game show in ages. Three, I really find bingo to be boring and stale to begin with. Luckily the producers of ABC’s primetime screw up retooled their show from the dreck that it was and created a fast paced fun little quiz show that is almost a full package.

The game is really really simple. $500 is put into the game’s jackpot at the start of the game. A ball is taken from the gigantic hopper that survived from ABC. At-home players mark it off their card ($50 goes to you if you get a bingo. Not bad if you ask me.). After the ball is placed on a glowing stand by co-host Crystal Wallasch, main host Patrick Duffy asks a question with no choices. A right answer adds the number of the ball into the game jackpot (in dollars obviously) and puts the letter on the ball on your board. If you miss, your opponent gets a free shot. All you have to do is spell BINGO to win a game. Two games gives you the jackpot and the right to play for $100,000. If a game takes a long time to complete, they switch to a two-choice question format after each ball is drawn to speed it up. For the bonus, there are 75 numbers. The champ picks numbers randomly off the board, and the first pair he or she matches (whether it be trips, prizes, or cash up to $100,000) is what he or she takes home in addition to the main game jackpot. At-home players have to bonus numbers on their downloaded card. If the studio player calls both of those numbers, the at-home player is a winner.

Let’s start with the set and music. Not much to say about the music, it’s stereotypical current game show music. Much better than the overly synthesized How Much is Enough? music but nothing to write home about like Lingo’s. The set is nice but again, the same as everything else today. It looks like a bruise; all black and blue. The huge hopper is there which is a nice touch. Also, it’s a GSN show with an audience! I know I gripe a lot about audiences, but you can’t fake the enthusiasm on a set with a canned audience. The graphics are also very nice too.

The hosts are good for the most part. Patrick Duffy keeps it going but has little time for any interaction or fun because of the constant throws to the at-home players. Truthfully, I got sick of it after a bit. I get the point and I think most of America gets the point of how to mark numbers off a card. A reminder in the beginning and middle of an act will suffice, not every five seconds. Co-host Crystal Wallasch is plays practically the same role the model on ABC’s version did, just taking the balls out of the chute and saying the number. They are sure to bill her on advertisements, press packs, and the website, but she does little beyond just stand there and shuts up. At least give her something to do. Talk to her for a few seconds, just something. Her job could have easily been done by Patrick the way they are doing it now.

The front game is actually pretty enjoyable. I think it’s worth noting that this is GSN’s first straight quiz show in a long long time. No word game here, it’s all quiz. The money is not bad at all. I’d expect to see game jackpots in the area of $1,250 to $2,000. It’s more than any other main game on GSN gives away to a person. The trivia questions are things you should know but often don’t which is nice as well. It’s a challenge, but not so much that it becomes frustrating like Camouflage. They move through it briskly as well so there’s little boredom.

One big step up from the ABC version is the fact that you don’t have to play the actual bingo game to participate. You can answer the questions and play along as well as marking off the cards if you choose. One small thing bugs me about the main game presentation, though. Every time they draw a ball they have to cue the dramatic lighting and music. At the start of the round is fine, but every 25 seconds for each ball, again, gets old very quickly.

Where the show drops the ball big time is in the end game. They go from a fast paced quiz show with a bingo aspect to complete luck of the draw “Pick numbers and you win what you match.” Not only that, it’s incredibly slow and lacks the tension it should have. It seems to me that they got really lazy in developing the show and just threw together anything they could. You’re telling me they couldn’t have made some bingo related end game instead of randomly picking numbers? In the game I watched, we got through three picks in four minutes. One thing I’d like to see is the layout of the board. I know there aren’t going to be tens of thousands of dollars floating around everywhere, but I’m sincerely hoping they don’t have a gap from like $10,000 to $100,000. I’d rather just have a lower top prize but more generous cash values. Regardless, the end game needs some serious tweaking to at least fit the theme of the show. It’s the only time I truly felt bored during the show.

All in all, it’s a nice little GSN quiz show. Nice money, nice presentation, nice game play, nice host. The truly disappointing thing is the end game. This review would be a bit more glowing if they had some substance there, but they took the easy way out which is rarely every a good way to go. However, there are a lot of positives to relatively make up for it. It’s nice to have a fast paced straight quiz show on the network again. Quick, fun, and fast: a perfect edition to GSN’s lineup.

A perfect addition would be a new season of Lingo to complement it, but oh well.

19
Feb

“My Dad is Better Than Your Dad” Bombs

Was it a huge shock to anyone that My Dad is Better Than Your Dad bombed?  I honestly think (and it’s probably true) that some major Hollywood players, like Mark Burnett, can pitch a show with the flimsiest and, to be honest, dumbest of concepts and get it picked up because that’s the person that’s making it.  This show just did absolutely nothing for me.  It was a stereotypical stunt show that seemed like a tamer version of American Gladiators with children thrown in.

I say it over and over: I really don’t like to complain about prizes, but seeing a show where people fight for $50,000 max after a show that gives away money like it’s nothing makes My Dad seem extremely cheap.  The Singing Bee could get away with it because it felt like a syndicated show that was placed in primetime television.  I don’t know where you’d throw My Dad is Better Than Your Dad, but it definitely felt completely wrong for a primetime show.

The show did nothing outright wrong, it just felt awkward to me.  The host, Dan Cortese, was annoying.  Just a regular talking head.  And not the good David Byrne type of Talking Head.  A good deal of the kids were annoying.  I think that word describes the show best: annoying.  I said the show was Double Dare taken too seriously and too far, and I was right on the money on that one.  Lighten it up, get a different host, put it on a channel like Nickelodeon or some other family oriented network and I think you could potentially, with work, have something.  It just felt completely wrong on primetime television.

And a good deal of America thought that too.  First off, Deal or No Deal had an unbelievably strong night with over 16 million viewers and a 10.0/16.  I tried dropping some hints before: executive producer Scott St. John said he’s not adding any more $1,000,000 cases after 13.  They didn’t say the mission was over.  Watch on Wednesday’s episode.  My Dad lost 48% of Deal’s audience; down to 5.3/8.  They should be happy that Hollywood is still recovering from the strike or it have been gone sooner than expected.  It still might be.

31
Jan

Russian Roulette

Network: GSN
Airings: Weekdays at 6:00PM ET, Tuesdays through Sundays at 10:00PM ET
Vote for how many stars you think the show deserves to the right, and then leave a comment!

Russian Roulette is the ultimate game of chance. Four contestants stand on “The Revolver” and on their own “Drop Zone”. A question is stated and the player in control chooses who to pass the question to (or they can answer it themselves in the final round). A right answer awards the challenged money while a wrong answer bankrupts a player and forces them to play “Russian Roulette” with however many drop zones are active for the question. When the handle is pulled, lights circle the set, and if a red light stops under the player’s feet, that person literally drops from the stage and is eliminated from the game. The sole survivor plays the Killer Questions and, potentially, one final game of “Russian Roulette” to win $100,000.

This is and was GSN’s quintessential game show and their only remote answer to the big money game show craze. It had it all: big money, amazing set, amazing soundtrack, fantastic host, tough trivia, and one of the best and most exciting end games on television. Honestly, there’s little to fault the show with other than a few production errors, especially in season two. The producers seemed to be very keen on making sure that players who chose not to gamble for $100,000 could have potentially won. It seems they often edited out the first hypothetical spin and threw in a second one to make sure they seemed like they made the right choice instead of losing out on six figures. The sound effects for the spin were completely screwed up for that season as well.

The only other larger issue was the questioning on the end game. They could just never seem to get it right. The five Killer Questions in 60 seconds seemed too easy, but the ten Killer Questions seemed too difficult to some. I really think six questions in the season one brainteaser format would have kept it a bit more original while making sure no one gets a three drop zone $100,000 spin. But that was a minor issue that barely made an impact in my eyes. Why’d the show disappear? Network politics and more. Hopefully with game shows fully back in the public eye some smart production company and network will bring this gem out and let it shine while there’s still a demand to see people fall through holes in the floor.

Rating: ★★★★½

Links
Clips and episodes of the show courtesy of creator Gunnar Wetterberg

21
Dec

“How Much is Enough?” Review

GSN is launching a new original on Tuesday, January 8th, called How Much Is Enough?. The game is honestly excessively simplistic and easy. A clock starts from $0 and goes to a predetermined dollar value or starts at a predetermined dollar value and goes to $0. Just don’t be the greediest person (or the cheapest either on the final $5,000 clock) and you win what’s on it. That’s it. No special bells and whistles. Not a gigantic neon set. Just a simple, nicely budgeted game of strategy and some body language, and that’s just fine. By just understanding that it’s not some spectacle of game play amazement, the show comes off as a fun half hour.

One keeping this show afloat is host Corbin Bernsen. He is absolutely fantastic. If he’s reading a teleprompter I can’t tell, and that’s what comes from a host who has TV experience and knows how to do things. With all due respect to people like Dylan Lane of Chain Reaction, if someone like him hosted the show would be terrible. Corbin keeps the game moving, can slow down the game and talk to the contestants while not making it boring, and creates a nice level of tension. Speaking of tension, watch out for the final clock where you’ll see tens of thousands of dollars available. Beyond Grand Slam, it’s the one of the more suspenseful thing I’ve seen on GSN in quite some time.

Continue reading ‘“How Much is Enough?” Review’

13
Dec

“1 VS 100″ Home Game Exclusive Deal

Just a quick reminder that the special deal for the 1 VS 100 electronic games ends on December 22nd, so get yours while you can!  For just $19.99 you can buy the tabletop electronic game. You can also buy the Mega Pack for $24.99 which includes both the tabletop AND the electronic handheld game. Both of these are also shipping and handling free, meaning you aren’t going to get these games this cheap in stores. I got these games long before we started this deal and I was honestly amazed by them, and we’re honored to have them partnering with us. Click one of the banners around the site to take a closer look at the deal which is available in the US and Canada, or click here to as well. Read on for a larger review of the game.

“I’m horrendously cheap and picky, but this game blew me away. If you’re a fan, there’s no excuse not to own this. It’s fun, it’s exciting, and it’s worth the money.” (From a June 7th post)

Continue reading ‘“1 VS 100″ Home Game Exclusive Deal’

28
Nov

“1 VS 100″ Home Game Exclusive Deal

You may have noticed some ads for the 1 VS 100 home games and were wondering what’s the deal with them? Yes, it’s an advertisement, but it’s a great one for you. iToys, the creator of the 1 VS 100, Deal or No Deal, and Family Feud (review coming soon) games, partnered with us to create an incredible discount on the amazing game. For just $19.99 you can buy the tabletop electronic game. You can also buy the Mega Pack for $24.99 which includes both the tabletop AND the electronic handheld game. Both of these are also shipping and handling free, meaning you aren’t going to get these games this cheap in stores. I got these games a long time ago and I was honestly amazed by them, and we’re honored to have them partnering with us. Click one of the banners around the site to take a closer look at the deal which is available in the US and Canada, or click here to as well. Read on for a larger review of the game. This deal only carries through December 22nd, so get it while you can. This post will run a very short number of times until Christmas just a reminder for people who don’t see it.

“I’m horrendously cheap and picky, but this game blew me away. If you’re a fan, there’s no excuse not to own this. It’s fun, it’s exciting, and it’s worth the money.” (From a June 7th post)

Continue reading ‘“1 VS 100″ Home Game Exclusive Deal’

22
Sep

“That’s The Question” Review: One of the better originals

The new season of That’s The Question was going to be interesting to say the least. If you saw the first twenty episodes you may know there were a few, uh, issues. The set was odd, music and sound effects were god awful, the writing was poor, too many factual errors, the show felt like it was missing something, and the show was horribly cheap. I was a fan of season one, but there was some fear for season two. Nothing against GSN, but recently they haven’t exactly had the greatest track record for originals. A huge sigh of relief came when I found that they fixed 75% of the issues.

We already saw pictures of the set, and it is extremely nice; one of the best ones GSN has put together. It’s not a Millionaire clone like Chain Reaction and it doesn’t feel like the set is five feet wide like Camouflage. Luckily they fixed the spelling and factual errors. It’s also nice to see that the show has more than pop culture questions which has become a trend recently. Host Bob Goen (Who we will have an interview with next week, stay tuned) is as good as ever, which is very good. He’s honestly the channel’s best host currently. The music is a bit better this season if not a bit too upbeat to a level of almost the first two seasons of Lingo. The main reason I enjoy it is because it’s something we have very few of anymore: a fast paced buzzer quiz show with two people competing against each other.

Now for a few issues. I think I’ve said it about 50 times, but every time I still hope I can give some hint to a production company or to GSN: do we always need easy to win bonus rounds for $5,000? Can’t we have a tiny bit of originality? The Dutch version has interesting rules. When you win the bonus you have the option to gamble your money and come back next show or stop. If you come back and lose the game, you lose all your money. However, if you come back and win, you double your money and you can be on three shows max. What is it with GSN and refusing to do returning champs? They air episodes in order, so come on. The only other issue I have is that the game can be a bit repetitive after a bit. Some sort of change mid-show, like a bonus puzzle or something, would be nice.

Beyond that, it’s easily one of the best shows they’ve done in a while. It’s amazing that they’ve been on an amazing track record recently with shows like Grand Slam, Without Prejudice?, and That’s The Question. It blows Camouflage (Insider FYI: I wouldn’t count on it coming back, as least as of today) out of the water for sure. However, all I ever feel when I’m watching the show is that there is something missing. It’s mainly in the bonus area, but something is missing. Other than that, they improved the show from season one exponentially. Fantastic host, fantastic set, fun game, good contestants (at least for now); other than a few tiny issues which were mentioned above, the show is more enjoyable than most game shows that have come out anywhere recently, and that includes both syndication offerings.

07
Aug

“Power of 10″ Review: Best Show in a While

I finished watching CBS’s Power of 10 on TiVo, and here is my initial reaction: “Wow, this is really good.” I know I’ve ragged on Michael Davies a lot recently because of what I still think is the worst revival I’ve ever seen, Chain Reaction (which I partially place on GSN’s restrictions as well, mind you). I think Mr. Davies has completely redeemed himself with both Grand Slam and this. We’ve gone over the rules extensively for the past few months, but you can read them by clicking this.

Simply put, shows like Power of 10, with 1 VS 100 thrown into this as well, continue to give me faith in our little genre while shows like Set For Life damage me on the inside. Let’s start with the positives. As with everything on TV currently, very nice set and music package. It keeps it modern while making it look different than what’s on currently. The contestants are likable. Drew Carey is very nice as host. He had a few issues, but big deal; this is episode one. Episode two tapes tomorrow so he can figure out how he comes off on TV. The gameplay is almost so unbelievably simple that it’s engaging, which makes it interesting. While I love 1 VS 100, it is a bit complicated. Power of 10 keeps it very simple while making it incredibly nerve-wracking, dramatic, and fun. Mr. Davies has a knack for doing that (See Millionaire, Who Wants to be a). The prize money keeps it fun too. I’m never one of the people that’s begging for assloads of money to be poured out, but I’m sick of every show on earth offering a million. Something unique will make it stand out, and this did it here.

Now for the negatives, which aren’t many. I know it’s just a product of Deal or No Deal, but I’m sick of the relationship seat having a part in the game. This is one thing I like about 1 VS 100; it’s just the player and the player alone. Do we really need a family member to help out? It’s very obvious that it’s to stretch time out, but I think something else can be done. One thing that may hurt this show is a lack of energetic, talkative contestants. If I have to sit through an hour of someone twisting a knob without giving off any emotion or essence of personality, I’ll go insane. I’m sorry, but I’m a person of current society. I need drama and intensity. For now it’s doing that. My only other problem is the money. Is this show going to make it too easy to win a million? For now, I think not. But to be honest, even if I had a slight guess, I’d take that 10% range I have and risk $90,000 for $900,000 more. One of the huge problems I had with the rules originally was that it was extremely simplistic. This is a strength for now, but I’m nervous if this will be a strength for a long period of time for the non-game show fans.

Please don’t let these comments distract you from the fact that the game is terrific. Every show has negatives, and I think this easily has the least amount of initial negatives out of any show I’ve reviewed. I place it right around 1 VS 100’s level. I’m sorry to reference the show so much this review, but I just see them as being similar. A good quiz show is very hard to come by, and this show is just what I wanted. We’ve been on a huge role with shows recently. I hope we can keep this up. Power of 10 is smart, dramatic, well-hosted, intense, energetic, and so much more. It’s everything I want in a game show and more. Simply put, Power of 10 is the power of CBS. What are your thoughts?

30
Jun

Early Look at “Without Prejudice?”

I was looking forward to the DVD of GSN’s new original game show Without Prejudice? for a very long time.  When it finally came yesterday, I popped that thing in, sat down on the couch, and readied myself for an hour of drama and thought provoking action.  My anticipation of this show was furthered by the constant commercials on GSN for its debut on July 17th at 9PM ET.  Did the actual show live up to the hype?  I can firmly say yes.  In fact, this is quite possibly one of the best, if not the best, show GSN has ever done.  Read on after the break for the rules and my opinions.

Continue reading ‘Early Look at “Without Prejudice?”’




 

Fatal error: Call to undefined function akst_share_form() in /home/content/m/r/g/mrgameshow/html/wordpress/wp-content/themes/redoable/footer.php on line 3