27Feb2007
BuzzerVision: 1 vs. 100′s Biggest Loss to Date
You requested it, so we got it… off the CNBC rerun.
About the Author
Nick Todor has written 181 articles on BuzzerBlog.
Visit this author's website · View more posts by Nick Todor
Discussion
8 responses to "BuzzerVision: 1 vs. 100′s Biggest Loss to Date"
I knew that as soon as I saw the choices. I had no earthly clue who the mayor of D.C. was, but I knew immediately that the other two were the mayors of Chicago and San Francisco, respectively.
I so need to try out for this show.
Hey, wait a sec. I’m guessing this is covered in the rules, but if 5 of the 15 guessed A (wrongly) and that was the most, then the other two must have had five answers. Does the trust the mob just result in a random choice, then? That’s horrible. Was this in your rule clarifications?
Paul, if A lit up, and 5 people guessed B, that means that MORE than 5 people picked A, making it a majority.
Oh duh. Sorry.
I knew it, but only because I just happened to be reading some news story that mentioned his name right before the show. I wasn’t familiar with the other two names, so if I were him, I probably would have fallen into the same trap. I think one of those mob members is still around, so she won a nice padding to that $52,000 on last Friday’s episode, and she’s still around.
Re: Mark.
Yes, that one woman took home an additional $9,500 for beating the first two contestants on the last show, but she was knocked out by the *Brady Bunch* question the third contestant received.
Man I felt so bad for the guy when that popped up B. He so wanted to pay off his moms house.
maybe it’s just me, but the dude almost looked like he wanted to shed a tear when B lit up (totally understandable too, given the circumstances)