<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BuzzerBlog&#8217;s &#8220;Deal&#8221; World Tour: Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/buzzerblogs-deal-world-tour-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/buzzerblogs-deal-world-tour-australia/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: LaJuan</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/buzzerblogs-deal-world-tour-australia/#comment-62611</link>
		<dc:creator>LaJuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 20:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=1827#comment-62611</guid>
		<description>It's funny that the reasons you like the show are the reasons I don't. DoND is not a quizzer. It is a game purely of luck and timing. You want questions, bring back Winning Lines (which I actually wouldn't mind....even though I never saw any episodes of the CBS run). The music sounded too much like Aussie's TPIR for my taste. However, I do agree with you on the Aussie 2x or Nothing as being a good one.

This format makes me think that having models is WAY BETTER than other people. The whole guessing what you have in the case takes the focus away from the REAL contestant. Plus, the models feel just as bad (if not worse) than regular people when the contestant is bit with bad luck. If they are not using models for the daytime series, I hope they're using the UK format.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny that the reasons you like the show are the reasons I don&#8217;t. DoND is not a quizzer. It is a game purely of luck and timing. You want questions, bring back Winning Lines (which I actually wouldn&#8217;t mind&#8230;.even though I never saw any episodes of the CBS run). The music sounded too much like Aussie&#8217;s TPIR for my taste. However, I do agree with you on the Aussie 2x or Nothing as being a good one.</p>
<p>This format makes me think that having models is WAY BETTER than other people. The whole guessing what you have in the case takes the focus away from the REAL contestant. Plus, the models feel just as bad (if not worse) than regular people when the contestant is bit with bad luck. If they are not using models for the daytime series, I hope they&#8217;re using the UK format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Power</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/buzzerblogs-deal-world-tour-australia/#comment-62607</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 16:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/?p=1827#comment-62607</guid>
		<description>The Aussie version is my fav. out of all of the ones I've seen, the theme msuic, set and the atmosphere give it an almsot TPIR feel and they do ask questions at the beginning so we know the person who plays for the money isn't a total idiot and the contestants for the most part are much smarter with their strategy. Their double or nothing is better format too (especially when they added a second case that said the other) but i dont think many contestants would risk all that much and how can you play double or nothing if you win the car? I'm a little surprised since the third contestant said she wanted $10K that she didn't risk $47K and walk away with a very nice $104,000.  the main issue I have with the Aussie version is the host is a little too excentric for my tastes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Aussie version is my fav. out of all of the ones I&#8217;ve seen, the theme msuic, set and the atmosphere give it an almsot TPIR feel and they do ask questions at the beginning so we know the person who plays for the money isn&#8217;t a total idiot and the contestants for the most part are much smarter with their strategy. Their double or nothing is better format too (especially when they added a second case that said the other) but i dont think many contestants would risk all that much and how can you play double or nothing if you win the car? I&#8217;m a little surprised since the third contestant said she wanted $10K that she didn&#8217;t risk $47K and walk away with a very nice $104,000.  the main issue I have with the Aussie version is the host is a little too excentric for my tastes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
