<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buzzer Podcast: June 27</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/buzzer-podcast-june-27/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/buzzer-podcast-june-27/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cory Anotado</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/buzzer-podcast-june-27/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Anotado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 06:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashgameshows.com/wordpress/?p=55#comment-31</guid>
		<description>In regards to the anonymous poster, I would like to say that you're taking game shows a bit too seriously. Sure, game shows are important, but that's not to say that game shows are our religion. We can step back and look at it. If you really, REALLY look at it, Vanna White deserves a star on the Walk of Fame because ANYONE can get on the Walk of Fame. And the fact that you're defending EVANDER HOLYFIELD ballroom dancing? That's laugable. Besides, who that watched it (12-35 year olds seem to be the key demographic here) remembers Arthur Miller's Dance Party? NO ONE! We are serious about doing this, but we're also serious about having some fun.

Lighten up - someone might take you too seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the anonymous poster, I would like to say that you&#8217;re taking game shows a bit too seriously. Sure, game shows are important, but that&#8217;s not to say that game shows are our religion. We can step back and look at it. If you really, REALLY look at it, Vanna White deserves a star on the Walk of Fame because ANYONE can get on the Walk of Fame. And the fact that you&#8217;re defending EVANDER HOLYFIELD ballroom dancing? That&#8217;s laugable. Besides, who that watched it (12-35 year olds seem to be the key demographic here) remembers Arthur Miller&#8217;s Dance Party? NO ONE! We are serious about doing this, but we&#8217;re also serious about having some fun.</p>
<p>Lighten up - someone might take you too seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/buzzer-podcast-june-27/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashgameshows.com/wordpress/?p=55#comment-30</guid>
		<description>While I congratulate you on your blog your podcast really leaves a lot to be desired. Did you listen to your work on the second podcast - it was awful. Is the podcast meant to celebrate game shows or to be sarcastic about the genre. Your contributor knocking Vanna White totally missed the point - she has been part of a #1 syndicated TV show for over 20 years. Regarding Dancing with the Stars - the show was a tribute to Arthur Murray's Dance Party of the '50s. People watched it because it was a class show that celebrated the star's ability to apply hard work and learning how to dance.

I don't mean thiss to be a lecture, but my sense is that you've got some talent - it seems to be a shame wasting it with an inferior effort.

If your serious about doing this - get it right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I congratulate you on your blog your podcast really leaves a lot to be desired. Did you listen to your work on the second podcast - it was awful. Is the podcast meant to celebrate game shows or to be sarcastic about the genre. Your contributor knocking Vanna White totally missed the point - she has been part of a #1 syndicated TV show for over 20 years. Regarding Dancing with the Stars - the show was a tribute to Arthur Murray&#8217;s Dance Party of the &#8217;50s. People watched it because it was a class show that celebrated the star&#8217;s ability to apply hard work and learning how to dance.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean thiss to be a lecture, but my sense is that you&#8217;ve got some talent - it seems to be a shame wasting it with an inferior effort.</p>
<p>If your serious about doing this - get it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: suz</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/buzzer-podcast-june-27/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>suz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashgameshows.com/wordpress/?p=55#comment-29</guid>
		<description>OMG,  YES.
The original one was funnier. And it didn't have that music problem I mentioned this morning. 

(She was not hot, dammit. At least not in &lt;I&gt;Full House&lt;/I&gt;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG,  YES.<br />
The original one was funnier. And it didn&#8217;t have that music problem I mentioned this morning. </p>
<p>(She was not hot, dammit. At least not in <i>Full House</i>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
