<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazing Race Ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/amazing-race-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/amazing-race-ratings/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://buzzerblog.flashgameshows.com/amazing-race-ratings/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://flashgameshows.com/wordpress/?p=83#comment-54</guid>
		<description>From my perspective: .4 may have improved demos and the median age, but in terms of overall numbers it's still pretty bad - particularly for the money GSN paid for it.   

As some may recall, back in the "old days" of the network, the...&lt;I&gt;Fantastic 4&lt;/I&gt; originals (Whammy!, Friend or Foe, Russian Roulette, and Lingo) all did AT LEAST a .6 to .8 in HH numbers when new, and still around a .4 even after several rerun cycles.   

.4 for a show GSN paid the amount they did (Relative to total amount taken in) is pretty bad, regardless the spin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my perspective: .4 may have improved demos and the median age, but in terms of overall numbers it&#8217;s still pretty bad - particularly for the money GSN paid for it.   </p>
<p>As some may recall, back in the &#8220;old days&#8221; of the network, the&#8230;<i>Fantastic 4</i> originals (Whammy!, Friend or Foe, Russian Roulette, and Lingo) all did AT LEAST a .6 to .8 in HH numbers when new, and still around a .4 even after several rerun cycles.   </p>
<p>.4 for a show GSN paid the amount they did (Relative to total amount taken in) is pretty bad, regardless the spin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
