07 Feb
Posted by Alex Davis as FOX, Fifth Grader?, Opinion, Reader Input
I would really like you all to tell me: should I be shocked that contestant coordinators for FOX’s new trivia show “Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader?” are looking for young, extremely attractive people to be contestants? Perhaps I should state this: to a level I can see what they are going for. The average audience will most likely be turned off by someone, to quote standup comic Maria Bamford, who is morbidly obese with tiny Tweety Bird ankles with a wandering eye. However, shouldn’t some level of intelligence be desired above all? Especially in a quiz show. I constantly check Craigslist for jobs or casting notices, and every single posting for FOX’s new TRIVIA show, and I stress the trivia part, “Are You Smarter than a Fifth Grader?” has the word “attractive” bolded. They are stressing that they want only good looking people for the show, and the rest won’t work.
This is primarily the reason that I am afraid of this new show. If this was taken as a semi-straight trivia show, like on the level that the terrific “1 VS 100″ is, the show could work. However, you just know that the entire basis of the show is going to be “Haha, look at the morons who don’t know what a fifth grader knows.” That’s going to get old very very quickly. Have we gone that far down? “1 VS 100″ and “Deal or No Deal” may have contestants that are over-the-top, but at least there are a vareity of contestants, all different ages, sizes, and appearances. However, what this show is quickly turning into is “Watch Johnny Six-Pack Be Outsmarted By Youngsters”. As much as I bitched and moaned about “Show Me the Money”, at least they had a variety of contestants. Hell, “Lingo” for seasons has wanted people specially 21 to 35 years old, but at least they get a couple dozen very good contestants. What is your opinion about this matter? Is casting a trivia show for looks a good idea for ratings, or is this going to hurt them because people don’t want to watch morons lose constantly?
16 Responses
Alex
1February 7th, 2007 at 1:03 am
It’s sad to see ANY show intentionally cast people that have a low(er) chance of winning big. The daytime “Millionaire” suffers hugely due to this… it’s ok to have tougher questions, but wasn’t at least some of the appeal of the show due to seeing people who had a legit shot at making it to the big-money questions? I don’t mind wanting to cast a more “divese” set of contestants with more “personality”, but it’s painfully clear that some of the contestants are just not that bright. Now, if “Are You Smarter” is casting for attractive people, fine, but if it is clear that a large portion of its contestants have neglected to pick up any significant reading beyond CliffNotes, my interest in the show will quickly diminish.
KP
2February 7th, 2007 at 3:44 am
This show can almost get away with being a dumb-off, at least within the bubble it’s in. Most shows can’t.
I’m guessing the contestant coordinators want ‘real people’ to get a shot at the money, rather than closeted brainiacs. But ‘real people’ have a VARIETY of personalities and appearances. Deal has had just about everything (OK, they’re way short of introverts, but that’s forgivable - and I speak as one myself), both in the UK and the US - and I’m absolutely positive that’s one reason, maybe even THE reason, the show is going to remain huge in the near future. 1 vs 100 does the same - yes, the mobsters often fit stereotypes, but they’re varied, well-chosen and often non-obvious stereotypes. This show… well, as we suggested before, Fox would be no worse off selling the post-Idol slot as an infomercial.
Marc Power
3February 7th, 2007 at 4:34 am
I know it isn’t but for some reason I think it’s wrong to only take attractive contestant. I know in the workforce if they wouldn’t hire a man becuase he was fat or a woman becuase she didn’t have big boobs (like many reality shows today are doing) you could take them to court for discrimination and that’s pretty much what their doing here.
KP
4February 7th, 2007 at 6:30 am
Oh that’s a damned good point.
John Goodman
5February 7th, 2007 at 7:20 am
At least there will be one average-looking man on the show (Foxworthy).
davec
6February 7th, 2007 at 1:10 pm
From everything that is being said about the show, it sounds like it’s going to be not much more than a Prime Time version of Jay Leno’s “Battle of the Jaywalk All Stars”, except with 5th graders who will make the people trying to answer very easy questions look even more stupid.
No thanks.
Brian
7February 7th, 2007 at 5:37 pm
Yeah, yeah, it’s a shame blah blah blah…
Did we really expect this show to be any good? I mean, it’s a Jeff Foxworthy gameshow on Fox. They are obviously trying to get the ditzy hawt people to look like idiots. Think Street Smarts without the irony.
Measles!
8February 7th, 2007 at 7:13 pm
…and this should surprise me in what way?
All these games nowadays are looking for people who don’t look like Alex after a night of drinking (no offense bro).
No brains are necessary to be on a gameshow anymore, unless it’s Jeopardy, but the way I get most of the questions right at home, I could probably get on, and I barely graduated high school. It’s a damn shame too…
Donald
9February 8th, 2007 at 12:31 pm
Eh, what did you expect from FOX? Smart ugly people?
Think about Price is Right. Think about Millionaire. Think about Wheel and Jeopardy! They don’t care about the way the contestants look. As long as they know how to play and are smart and Three of those four game shows have been on the air for over 20 years non-stop. Millionaire is on its way hiting 10 years in ‘09.
Dog Eat Dog, Fear Factor, Weakest Link, $how me the Money, Rich List are cancelled because they only cared about looks. Fear factor may have lasted 5 or 6 seasons, but it got old and tired after the second season when all you kept seeing was desperate actors and models who think their farts smell like roses.
KP
10February 9th, 2007 at 1:28 am
Not everyone seems to know how to play TPIR (if they did, Hit Me would still be in the rotation) but they do seem to get a decent bunch on the whole, and they pick people who’ll be entertaining - regardless of appearance. Deal or No Deal looks like it’s pulling off the same trick on both sides of the Atlantic, though our contestants here are far less consistently extroverted than the US contestants.
And when sucky people get on Millionaire, it’s: a) usually rabbit-in-headlights stuff from reasonably smart people; b) gets them out of the chair PDQ. There’s your 50:50 right there.
Daren
11February 11th, 2007 at 4:13 pm
I just came back from a taping of this show and you hit the nail on the head. The lady who was answering questions was dumb, dumb, dumb. And yet, she won $100,000.00 for being an idiot. I knew every answer immediately (What is the closest star to the Earth?, What is the name of the ship that the Pilgrams came over to America in?) and she hemmed and hawed and had to get help. It was ridiculous. I came home and asked my 2nd and 4th grader these questions and they knew most of the answers. It was embarrasing and if this is the average intelligence level of Americans, I now have a better understanding of why G. W. Bush was elected twice. I guess it’s fitting that Jeff Foxworthy is hosting.
“5th Grader?” controversy brewing, diffusing « Hard Drive Life
12February 28th, 2007 at 11:01 pm
[...] It was previously reported on this blog and in BuzzerBlog that “attractive” contestants were specified in the Craigslist casting call ad for the show, making one think that contestants’ intelligence is secondary. [...]
Steve Barr
13March 2nd, 2007 at 8:05 pm
I counted. You have 13 minutes of commercial time of every 30 minutes of show. I love the show, but cannot stand the constand commercial breaks. I will not watch this show again.
Dimitri Stoodley
14March 25th, 2007 at 5:21 pm
To me I think its one of the best shows that they ever put on TV to embarrase adults. Just to think how dum can adult who went through school and not be smarter than a 5th grader, how stupid is that. And come on, one girl new all th 5th grade questions but didnt know th 1st grade questions, how stupid can she get.
Smart Canadian
15March 31st, 2007 at 1:18 pm
It seems to me the contestants represent an accurate cross section of america. The woman who thought that North America was made up of a single country and couldn’t figure out that Australia was actually the only continent that’s also a single country clinched it for me. ‘Just proves so glaringly that you guys no absolutely nothing about the actual world outside of your own country. FYI, CANADA and MEXICO are also part of North America…..I’m sure this comes as a shock to most of you….it’s not just black, uninhabited space all around the states you know? Sick, self-centred, and REALLY sad! I was in Mexico recently and this american twit asked me if I had to come through Alaska to fly there. Um….yeah, HELLO, we have actual cities here with airports and planes and everything just like you do you idiot! What a freakin’ joke! Many of you are dumber than FIRST Graders! When we Canadians watch shows like this it just proves to us that we live next to vast ignorance and it scares the hell out of us! Read a book america!
Lisa
16April 23rd, 2007 at 5:04 pm
Hi, I’m a member of Mensa & used to model. Not all attractive people are stupid, and not all smart people are unattractive!
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a Reply
You may also like...
Recent Videos
Buzz In
Biggest Buzz
Categories